Friday, January 20, 2012


Today's program notes... are entitled… Impolitic.
And week before last… we spoke of Tabula Rasa – of a blank slate, an erased tablet – a Latin term one could reference… when considering remedial actions… for the lifetime of brainwashing and social engineering… to which you and yours… all numericans… have been deliberately subjected. I shared a snippet at
… Entitled Make Your Own Money. Had I erred when I aired… my disgust… when I spoke of trading in company script? And are we so morally bankrupt as a People that looking the other way in the face of large-scale corruption, racketeering, and organized crime… is today seen… as a necessary cost for political correctness… in all our busy-ness?  
If you were here last Saturday… we spoke of the zombie apocalypse… which is upon us… as a result. In fact, Uncle Sam wants you… for his zombie army. For which it must be asked, “Are you sure… dear ol’ Uncle Sam… has your best interests… at heart?”
Please check out the following 3 books by Mr. E. C. Riegel, the man who brought all of this information forward 60 to 70 years ago, and the additional information.

(An introductory work on E.C. Riegel - very helpful first read)

Also, I invite you to look into the associated "Free state" ideals we are bringing forward across America right now. Read our 'Covenant' and 'Governing Document' and see how that feels to you compared to what we now have functioning as "government". Check this out here:

Finally, here are two very well done and powerful videos I encourage you to watch to learn more about the 'Money Power' problem:


Vaccine warfare! Texas carpet-bombs 7,000 square miles with air-dropped rabies vaccines

(NaturalNews) The weaponization of vaccines just took another leap forward in America with the recent air-dropping of rabies vaccines by the Texas Department of State Health Services. Using a battery of small planes based out of Del Rio, Texas recently dropped 1.8 million edible vaccine packets over 7,700 square miles of rural Texas.

The packets contain edible rabies vaccines dipped in fish oil and coated with fish meal to entice foxes and coyotes to eat them. Once consumed, the animal is "vaccinated" against rabies, researchers claim.

Of course, what these researchers don't yet understand in their scientific ignorance (and arrogance) is that they are also engaged in a rabies DNA / RNA bombardment of Texas. As even the Institute of Medicine has admitted, MMR vaccines for use in humans actually cause measles because many of the vaccines contain live viral strains. (

Vaccine manufacturing is conducted under such poor quality control today that vaccines are routinely shipped out the door containing viable viral strains that often infect and sometimes even kill human victims. For example, in 2009 Baxter Pharmaceuticals was caught red-handed shipping out live avian flu viruses to 18 countries (

What Texas Dept. of State Health Services workers probably don't yet grasp is that vaccine manufacturers routinely use vaccines to spread the very disease they claim to be preventing. By injecting live rabies strains into a small percentage of the vaccines dropped on Texas (say, one percent), they are effectively engaging in a DNA carpet-bombing run that will absolutely guarantee rabies continues to remain endemic throughout feral animal populations in the state. This, of course, will result in yet more rabies vaccines being purchased to "combat the problem," thereby achieving the goal of the entire scam: To sell more vaccines to the government.

Vaccines become weapons to be inflicted on innocents

This air-dropping of vaccines over Texas is all part of the militarization of modern medicine taking place today. In just the past few months, we've seen the AMA calling for "mandatory participation" in vaccine trials, where you would be "volunteered" by the government to be injected with an experiment vaccine, at threat of arrest (

We've also seen cases where police have been called and CPS workers threatened to take children away from parents who refused to vaccinate their children (

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has already conducted bizarre experiments on genetically engineered mosquitoes that carry vaccines to be silently injected into unsuspecting humans. And that same foundation has also invested heavily in covert vaccination technology that could, for example, vaccinate you with a spray mist used at airport security checkpoints (

As these examples show, vaccines are increasingly being used in the context of weapons: air-dropped, covertly injected or even forcibly injected at gunpoint. These are signs of a system of medicine that operates like a police state, where people are stripped of their rights and freedoms "for the good of society." The individual is sacrificed, in other words, to serve the interests of the state. Such a philosophy is fully consistent with the entire history of secret government-funded medical experiments against blacks (Tuskegee), Guatemalans (, and even criminal medical experiments involving Dr. Jonas Salk and the polio vaccine (

Here's a list of just a few of the criminal, inhuman medical experiments that have been conducted on innocent people by the U.S. government:

All this adds up to classic eugenics -- especially given that vaccines in humans are strongly tied to lifelong infertility, spontaneous abortions and birth defects. It's all part of a human de-population agenda that Bill Gates has openly admitted to in his public speeches about "reducing world population" with the help of vaccines (

The law of unintended consequences will come back to haunt Texas

The state of Texas, of course, claims its air-dropped rabies vaccines have been a huge success. Rabies cases have plummeted in every area targeted by the vaccine carpet-bombing runs, they insist. But even if you believe those numbers, you must ask: At what cost?

What are the unintended consequences of air-dropping viral fragments of rabies over 7,000 square miles of open terrain? Engaging in such an act is just begging to be humbled by nature as that viral material gets recombined into some other deadly pathogen that exists in the wild, creating a hybrid "Franken-virus" that never would have existed without this arrogant "scientific" intervention. Can you imagine a "rabies bird flu pandemic?" Mother Nature can!
Where Belief Meets Reality

“Oh Mortal Man, is there nothing you cannot be made to believe?”
 — Adam Weishaupt
Meanwhile consider a few relevant and verifiable facts about the present condition of the world.

    It is easily proven that Alice A. Bailey transcribed a "PLAN" to paper as it was revealed to her by her guiding spirit, Djwhal Khul. Bailey made it clear that the Plan would be implemented by a "New Group of World Servers", their disciples, and aspirants. World Servers are the "hidden hand" aka the "powers that be" which happens to be hiding in plain sight. If you doubt that there is presently such a class of people in service to the world, then simply Google "World Service" and find out who some of the players are, and their activities. Then ask; Do those activities contribute to the "Plan"? Oh! You don't know what the Plan is?

    The phrase "heaven on earth" may be passé, but The Founding of the Kingdom remains very much alive as a concept, vision, or Utopian dream. Whatever it may be called, it remains the "immediate goal". Chapter 7 of Bailey's book "From Bethlehem to Calvary" is titled "Our Immediate Goal - The Founding of the Kingdom.

    The dialectic is the process of moving society along a predefined path to a prescribed outcome. It is active through all ideologies and philosophies to offer a plethora of choices on every issue you can name, be it political, economic, religious or social. There is no political party, economic philosophy, theology or any ideology which has immunity from the dialectic process. Anyone holding a position in any of these areas is a defacto participant in the dialectic process.

    While the dialectic is the alchemical process for change, there needs to be a motive force driving it along which cuts across all political, economic, religious or social ideologies. That motive force is technology. There is no political party, religion, economic method or social philosophy capable of effectively standing against the driving force of technological development.

    Technological development is moving toward an objective called the "Technological Singularity". The word 'technology' itself has been redefined in common usage to mean Intellectual Technology (IT), and nearly always indicating the Internet. In the view of one Market Insights Professional, "New IT servicing models like cloud ... make it easier for non-technical employees to download and install technology services." Among those technology services, are social networking services such as Facebook. One of the key phrases I came across during my research was "democratization of technology". That is another way of saying Communitarian, Third Way, facilitated consensus driven technology, or technological advancement by democratic vote. Social unity is a key component to insure that everyone is brought into the group think mentality, and as I have documented, there is a large number of people and organizations -- many religious -- working toward that end. People are actively "voting" for every technological advancement using their thumbs on their personal IT devices.

    Can you say complicity?

    COMPLICITY; association with, or participation in or as if in, a wrongful act

    Complicity follows complaisance, 1: marked by an inclination to please or oblige 2: tending to consent to others' wishes. Deception happens whenever the inclination to please or oblige is acted upon. The action constitutes participation in or as if in, the wrongful act, complicity.

By Diogenes

Myself when young did eagerly
Doctor and Saint, and heard
great argument
About it and about, but evermore
Came out by the same Door
as in I went.

Omar Khayyam

"The very experts who inform and educate us are the very people who are most indoctrinated, because they have agreed somewhere along the line to become members of the corporate club, swearing somewhere along the line to lie and betray in order to keep their jobs, and reaching the point somewhere along the line where they don't remember what happened to them".

Explained and Exposed
Is Judaism REALLY the religion of the Old Testament? Why did Christ rebuke the Jewish leaders so? This area is dedicated to explain & expose why it is a common misconception to think that Judaism is the Old Testament religion. The files here will allow you to see the Truth about Judaism and also, what the TRUE Old Testament religion was (and is)... Herein will be explained about the impossible term:
and what forces have been at work circumventing and attacking True Christianity and replacing it with its much more politically correct and acceptable version termed immediately above...
As you read these files with an open mind, heart, and Bible, you will find that Christians are being lied to from the pulpits and from the many books that fill the Christian book stores...But more importantly you will learn the ominous Truth about Talmudic Judaism, and its plot to destroy Christianity and create a One World Order (NWO). The files here seek to prove that the Global Push into the NWO is an ancient and secret concept with its formation deeply rooted in Talmudic Judaism. It is hoped that these files can instill in you a thirst for Truth and then a call to action - the very least you could do is to warn others and educate your pastors with this important and meaningful information. If, in spite of all your prayers and encouragement, your pastors refuse to look at this information, and fail in their supreme RESPONSIBILITIES as Christian leaders, then you need to do the Christian thing and REBUKE them in Christian conviction and Love. If your pastor would rather be "Politically Correct" than "Biblically Correct", then you should KNOW something is wrong...

Michael Hoffman:

We Must Realise That We Are Now In The Era Of The Revelation Of The Method

video tutorial

Search: "Externalization of the Hierarchy"
Sukiyaki (“I Look Up When I Walk”, with lyrics)
Kyu Sakamoto (Hisashi Oshima) was born on November 10, 1941 in Kawasaki City (Kanagawa Prefecture), Japan.
Ue o Muite Aruko (I Look Up When I Walk) was released in Japan in 1961.
The music was composed by Hachidai Nakamura.
The lyrics written by Rokusuke Ei, is said to have written this after his heart was broken by the actress, Meiko Nakamura.
It was released in the United States in 1963 and became an International hit. To date, this is the only song that has made it to #1 in the U.S. by a Japanese Singer.
Louis Benjamin, the head of the UK's Pye Records, heard the song while visiting Japan. He brought a copy home and had Kenny Ball & the Jazzmen do a version of it, which he re-titled "Sukiyaki" after his favorite Japanese dish, and had it go into the top ten.
Shortly thereafter, DJ Richard Osbourne of the radio station KORD in Pasco of Washington State started playing the original version by Kyu Sakamoto, using the "Sukiyaki" title. There were frequent requests for the song and Capitol picked up the record. The song went to #1 in Billboard for three weeks and sold over a million copies in the United States.
Kyu Sakamoto was killed on 12 August 1985 at the age of 43 when JAL Flight 123, a 747 was bound from Haneda Airport in Tokyo to Osaka. The bulkhead of the plane failed due to a tail strike incident seven years prior. The Pilots attempted to make an Emergency landing but the airplane crashed into a mountain, 60 miles northwest of Tokyo, killing 520 and injuring four. While the plane spiraled downwards for approximately 30 minutes, Kyu was able to write a farewell note on a napkin for his wife.
He was married to Yukiko Kashiwagi in 1971 and they had two daughters, Hanako and Maiko.

Why the Illuminati Expose the Conspiracy

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

The Illuminati don't just want your children, your spouse, your property, and your freedom.

Your birthright isn't sufficient for these Satanists. They want the ultimate prize.
They want your soul.

They tell us about the conspiracy because they want us to be compromised. Just as lower-ranked Freemasons or ordinary Jews or Americans or Europeans are compromised by their support for war. They want us all to become demons.

They are deliberately clumsy because they want our complicity. They don't want us to say, "Gee, we didn't know."

They have a wager with God. They can win us over to Lucifer. But they have to give us free will, the ability to make a choice.     

That's the reason they reveal the conspiracy to us. For example, the Rockefellers sponsored the John Birch Society. Their publication, The New American is still one of the best sources of information about the elite conspiracy. This controlled opposition has other functions. They are able to
steer the blame and make sure no real resistance ever develops.

This is why many websites like David Icke's, Jeff Rense's and my own function with little difficulty. They want everyone to know. Some other websites may actually receive support from the Illuminati.

Ralph Epperson, author of The Unseen Hand (1985) has been teaching about the New World Order since the 1980's. He told me that he had never encountered any push-back from the elite.

This is why they are so sloppy. Anyone can see that no planes hit the Pentagon or crashed at Shanksville. They want us to compromise ourselves by accepting these stories and abandoning the victims. Thus we become accomplices in their crimes.

In the movie, The Devil's Advocate, based on the novel by Andrew Niederman and produced by Arnon Milchan and Arnold Kopelson, the devil (Al Pacino) tells Kevin Lomax, the ambitious lawyer played by Keanu Reeves:
"I only set the stage, free will, you pull your own strings!"

He shows Kevin that he cannot blame anyone but himself. Kevin was driven by his own egotism and venality. He abandoned his wife in her hour of greatest need, and she committed suicide. He got many  guilty people acquitted because he "never loses."    

Then the devil provides us with the Luciferian manifesto: Essentially it is the belief that man is defined by his carnal appetites and desires (greed, power, lust) rather than by his soul and spiritual ideals (truth, justice, beauty.) Man serves Lucifer by giving in to these temptations, by being an accomplice in his own destruction.  The Illuminati always has promoted indulging our base instincts calling this "sexual liberation" and "open marriage." This undermines family. Their psychology always has been against "repression" (i.e. self-discipline.) This view that man is God, and his wishes are the measure of all things, is called "Secular Humanism" aka "Luciferianism".
John Milton (the devil): Who are you carrying all those bricks for anyway? God? Is that it? God? Well I tell you let me give you a little inside information about God. God likes to watch. He's a prankster. Think about it. He gives man instincts. He gives you this extraordinary gift, and then what does He do, I swear for His own amusement, his own private, cosmic gag reel, He sets the rules in opposition. It's the goof of all time. Look, but don't touch. Touch, but don't taste. Taste, don't swallow. Ahaha. And while you're jumpin' from one foot to the next, what is he doing? He's laughin' His sick, fuckin' ass off! He's a tight-ass! He's a SADIST! He's an absentee landlord! Worship that? NEVER!

Kevin Lomax: "Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven", is that it?

John Milton: Why not? I'm here on the ground with my nose in it since the whole thing began. I've nurtured every sensation man's been inspired to have. I cared about what he wanted and I never judged him. Why? Because I never rejected him. In spite of all his imperfections, I'm a fan of man! I'm a humanist. Maybe the last humanist. Who, in their right mind Kevin, could possibly deny the twentieth century was entirely mine."

The devil reveals that he is Kevin's father and demands Kevin have sex with his seductive half-sister in order to breed a successor. Rather than succumb to this temptation, Kevin kills himself.

Just saying "No" should have been enough. We will not be accomplices in our own destruction. We will not forfeit our soul. understanding free will
Iron Mountain: Blueprint to Tyranny
(Full RARE Video)

Rolling Stone

Scott Olsen: Casualty of the Occupation

He was a Marine who survived two tours of Iraq, but it was the Oakland police who almost killed him

As with other Occupations, there's a heady carnival vibe, laced with serious debate and an old-fashioned communitarian civility. If someone bumps into you, ...
Solving the Paradox of Current World History
Lord Palmerston's Multi Cultural Zoo
Solving the Paradox of Current World History
By Nancy Spannaus
Presidents Day, 1994

Videos of all the panel presentations

Solving the Paradox of Current World History - Nancy Spannaus, Panel Chair

    Introduction—Webster Tarpley

    The Venetian Takeover of England: A 200-Year Project—by Gerald Rose

    How The Venetian Virus Infected and Took Over England—H. Graham Lowry

    British Intelligence Subversion: Shelburne and Bentham—Jeffrey Steinberg

    America's 'Young America' movement: slaveholders and the B'nai B'rith—Anton Chaitkin

    Palmerston launches Young Turks to permanently control Middle East—Joseph Brewda

    Freud and the Frankfurt School—Michael Minnicino

    Jim Crow, a cultural weapon in the hands of the Confederacy—Dennis Speed


Foxconn chairman equates iPhone-creating workforce to animals
First reported by Want China Times earlier today, chairman Terry Gou was meeting with senior managers and stated “”Hon Hai has a workforce of over one million worldwide and as human beings are also animals, to manage one million animals gives me a headache.” Hon Hai is the parent company of Foxconn, the company responsible for creating the majority of iPhones and iPads for Apple. Gou also stated that he would like to learn from the director of the Taipei Zoo, Chin Shih-chien, as to how animals should be managed. While it was also reported that these comments were possibly made in jest which was lost in the translation, the working conditions of Foxconn employees are certainly no joking matter.
In a recent taping on This American Life, author Mike Daisey recorded an interview regarding a visit to Shenzhen, China where the Foxconn manufacturing plant is located. While Foxconn also manufacturers electronics for Dell, HP, Lenovo, Nokia, Panasonic, Samsung and Sony, Daisey specifically toured the plant where employees create Apple’s MacBook Pros, iPhones and iPads. Foxconn employees have recently been in the news after a threat of mass suicide was issued over a pay dispute, but resolved the issue a few days later. While you can listen to the entire interview at this link, here’s a summation of the working conditions inside the 430,000 person-strong factory that produces Apple’s hardware according to Daisey:
Living within dormitories inside the factory walls, employees are packed into 144 square foot (12-by-12) cement rooms with 15 beds stacked up like bunk-beds. Employees are often placed into rooms where they do not know anyone as well. Any attempt at forming a union is met with arrest and a prison sentence as unions are illegal within China. Workers cleaning iPhone screens used a chemical called hexane, specifically because the chemical solution evaporates faster and allows the production line to speed up. However, a worker on a 34 hour shift dies while Daisey tours the facility. On the factory floor, there’s no talking allowed among the 20,000 to 30,000 workers. There’s also little machinery on the floor since labor costs are far lower than machines. However, Gau has stated publicly that investing in advanced automation is a high priority. Workers that have developed severe carpal-tunnel issues from repeating the same process over and over are simply fired. Foxconn could eliminate this issue by rotating jobs between employees, but they do not. Workers that get severely injured on the job are fired without any severance and workers that complain about working conditions are fired as well as black-listed with all companies that operate within Shenzhen.
According to New York Times columnist Paul Krugman in the same interview, he estimates that workers in the Foxconn manufacturing plant make approximately $250 a month. This comes out to less than $10 a day or about 75 cents an hour on a standard 12-hour shift, far less when a new product is going to be released.
Apple has remained silent on the manufacturing process in China, but has made no attempt to distance themselves from Foxconn or Gou’s remarks. Attempting to improve working conditions in the factory to a level equal with American working conditions would likely have a severe impact on the prices of new iPads, iPhones and other Apple electronics. The company would also make less money per unit sold which would ultimately impact shareholder confidence in the company. 

This article was originally posted on Digital Trends

Channeling Reality / Vicky Davis

The old saying that "the devil is in the details" is obvious when it comes to "sustainable development" (SD). Launched at the international level, SD is promoted through U.N. Agenda 21 (a "global plan of action"), U.N. Earth Charter initiatives, and Education for
Sustainable Development processes, to name a few. Less known is the support for the global agenda by certain members of the U.S. Congress.

This document contains a list of bills introduced in the U.S. Congress from 1987 to 2011 that are related to "sustainable development" agendas. Collectively, the proposals underscore the fact that "sustainable development" has tentacles reaching into all areas of
life, and, is behind many problems at local, county, state, and national levels.

Looking at the bills, it becomes clear that we the people must elect officials to represent us who will not allow the excessively regulatory, costly, liberty- and property-rights-destroying "global plans" into our institutions. We need representation by those who will
reject the unaccountable pressure groups that promote "sustainable development" ideas that result in higher taxes, increased debt, and a lower living standard. This means we must scrutinize our choices for U.S. President, Congressional and state legislators, governors, city/ county/state officials, and school boards members.

For those who are unfamiliar with U.N. Agenda 21 and "sustainable development", SECTION I contains some background information. But I encourage you to seek others who -- through their years of research and experience -- have much knowledge about the endless troubles that link to these U.N. issues (see Learn More, p. 15-16).

Research by Debra K. Niwa, January 2012

2 Introduction

3 About Agenda 21
4 Issues mentioned in bills related to “sustainable development”
5 Four aspects of sustainable development
7 Restructuring government (regionalism, public-private partnerships)
11 "Smart Growth" is sustainable development
13 Education and sustainable development
15 Learn more

18 Bills introduced for "sustainable development" -- proposed in the
100th to 112th U.S. Congress
Quizlet Flash Cards: Vocabulary
Theology 101
Manicheans  -A teaching that is simultaneously dualist and materialist
-Teaches a division between good and bad matter
Sola fide        -Latin for "by faith alone"
-Faith in Jesus Christ alone justifies you, without doing any good works
-It is a gift
Sola scriptura           -Latin for "by scripture alone"
-Everything you need to know to be saved is self-evident in scripture
Righteousness/Justification          -To be in right relationship with God
Gnosticism    -A form of dualism, in which spirit is good and matter is evil
-Teaches that salvation comes through special knowledge
Martyr -Greek for "witness"
-Christians use it to refer to someone who died for their faith (this definition is only used among Christians)
-An example of faith that bears witness to the grace and power of God and the holy spirit through death
Passover       -Event in the Old Testament when the Angel of Death "passed over" the Jewish first born and killed every Egyptian first born in the final plague on Egypt
-Blood over doors marked the Jewish homes which the Angel passed over
-Celebrated every year by the Jews
Creation         -The act by which God brings things into existence and/or what God brings into existence
Apostle           -Greek for "one who is sent"
-Christians use it to refer to one who is sent by Jesus to fulfill his
Parable          -An analogical story used to teach a lesson
Torah  -Hebrew for "law"
-States what it is that the Jews must do to fulfill their covenant with God
Anoint            To mark with oil as the sign of some sacred task
Exile   -When the leadership of the Southern kingdom of Israel was taken to Babylon
Messiah         -Hebrew for "anointed one"
-The name/title given by Jews to the figure who would come and restore the united kingdom of David
Christ -Greek for "anointed one"
-The name/title given by Jews to the figure who would
come and restore the united kingdom of David
Baptism          -Greek for "to wash or clean with water"
-Christians use it to describe the washing away of sins
-A requirement for becoming a Christian
Covenant      -A contract which binds two parties
-The first was between Abraham (and his descendants) and God
YHWH            -Hebrew for "I am (who I am")
-The NAME of God as revealed to Moses in the Old Testament
Disciple          -Latin for "student"
-Students of Jesus Christ
Church          -Greek for "a group called together for some purpose"
-Jesus' followers in Acts of the Apostles
Gospel           -Greek for "good news"
-The good news of (about and/or from) Jesus Christ
Passion         -The suffering of Jesus Christ from the Garden of Gethsemane to his death on the cross
Nativity           -The birth of Jesus Christ
Annunciation           -When the Archangel Gabriel appeared to the Virgin Mary and told her that she would be the Mother of God
Visitation       -When Mary visits her cousin Elizabeth, and John the Baptist leaps for joy in Elizabeth's womb
Presentation -When Mary and Joseph take Jesus to the temple after his birth according to Jewish law and Simeon recognizes him as the Messiah
Pentecost      -The event fifty days after the Resurrection when the Holy Spirit descends on the apostles in the upper room
Ascension     -The event forty days after the Resurrection when Jesus is taken up into heaven, body and soul
Repent           -Greek for "to turn around or away from"
-Christians use it to refer to turning away from sin
-Requirement for becoming a Christian
Bro Gregory / His Holy Church / Freedomizer Radio Archive
Bro. Gregory / His Holy Church
Keys of the Kingdom Radio Broadcast 2012 Archive
What is Religion?
Bro. Gregory video tutorial

Language and Linguistics: The Key Concepts
By R.L. Trask
Edited by Peter Stockwell
Terrible Truth
‘Professor’ Fred, ‘Eliza’ Bâri′, And Reverend Dr. King
By Martha Trowbridge
In George Bernard Shaw’s famous play Pygmalion, a cocky professor bets he can take a girl from the streets of London and so transform her, she will pass for a duchess amongst British elite. Professor Henry Higgins’s scheme with Eliza Doolittle will succeed, he is confident, “by teaching her to assume a veneer of gentility, the most important element of which, he believes, is impeccable speech.”
Higgins’ scheme to ‘fundamentally transform’ Eliza had great ‘social purpose’: by so doing, he would slap society in the face, by infiltrating the upper classes with a fake persona who pretended to be one of them.

Not for a moment did Professor Higgins concern himself with what would become of Eliza, once his experiment concluded.

Or, if it failed, and she was ‘outed’.

George Bernard Shaw, an “ardent socialist” was not only a playwright, he was a political activist.

Now, who in the “Barack Obama” family constellation does this remind us of?

That’s right.

“Uncle Fred” Newman.

“Obama’s” “Uncle Fred” - master socialist political activist, and ‘social justice’ playwright.

NY Times, 9 July 2011
Fred Newman, Writer and Political Figure, Dies at 76

As I revealed in Obama RUI: Running Under The Influence Of Uncle Fred, “Barack Obama II” was most probably a character created by “Uncle Fred”, to effect his four-decades-long dastardly scheme to overthrow America.

To slap America in the face with socialism, by infiltrating America’s White House with a candidate who purported to be ‘one of us’.

Enter, stage left: Fred’s leading male character, “Barack Obama”.

Rare Paperweight Inkwell
Le Quebecois Libre
Arthur Miller's Death of a Salesman: A Case of Self-Delusion
By Edward W. Younkins
They Dare to Speak Out
By Paul Findley
Real Reason for Lehman Bros. Collapse? Another Insane International Tribunal
Finance tribunal opens to settle disputes ... Disputes arising from complex transactions can be put for possible resolution at the world's first international specialist finance tribunal from Monday. The Hague-based tribunal, funded by the Dutch government, aims to build up internationally recognised legal precedent in an area that can be opaque to even the most senior national judges who have previously heard disputes over credit derivatives, collateralised debt obligations or other exotic products that gained notoriety during the financial crisis. – Financial Times

Dominant Social Theme: Global justice is inevitable, and necessary. It's not totalitarian, mind you, merely part of the process of "rationalizing" the decision-making process so everyone knows where they stand.
Free-Market Analysis: "They" are at it again. Supposedly the Dutch government had the bright idea to create a global "financial tribunal." But who gets up in the morning and decides that what the world needs is a better way to resolve disputes about derivatives and other artificial securitized instruments?
The problem is NOT that there is no prestigious and final word from a judicial authority on these insane instruments. The problem is that they exist at all.
They are purely the flotsam and jetsam of central banking. By printing endless amounts of money from nothing, the great central banking families that control tens and even hundreds of trillions of dollars have entirely distorted the world's economy.
We call what has occurred "Dreamtime." It lasted for at least 100 years, throughout the 20th century, and during that time Western middle classes were convinced of the efficacy and necessity of the current system.
Pre-Internet, the power elite's dominant social themes ruled the day. It was a matter of certainty that various fear-based promotions were not only accurate but inevitable. Only a hopelessly optimistic person would have argued that there were not too many people in the world, that starvation was all-but-inevitable, that oil was running out, that the environment was hopelessly befouled, that the world was not in the transformative grip of a terrible global warming.
And yet none of these have proven to be true. They are the malicious memes of the elite, floated to frighten middle classes into giving up wealth and authority to global authorities such as the UN, IMF and World Bank.
The Daily Bell
Pat Buchanan on Ron Paul, the Internet and Ethnic Politics in the 21st Century
Daily Bell: You were recently featured in James Jaeger's film "SPOiLER" and in an earlier film called "Original Intent."  Cultural Marxism was a big discussion in these films. Can you expand on that discussion?

Pat Buchanan: I use the phrase Cultural Marxism to describe what Antonio Gramsci had in mind for the West, after he went to Russia. He saw Lenin's Soviet Union as a failure, in that, while the regime had total power and the obedience of its citizens, the people were terrified of it and gave it no loyalty, allegiance or love. And eventually the Soviet Union would and did collapse, as did Mao's China.  Gramsci believed in the cultural approach.  He believed that, through a long march through the institutions of the West, Marxists could overturn Christianity, the heat shield of the West that made people automatically reject Marxism.  If you could extirpate Christian culture from the heart of Western man, with the "acids of modernity," destroy this heat shield, people would embrace Marxist ideas and you could advance your ideology, and the people would be more receptive to it. 

What we call Cultural Marxism has certainly been more successful than the economic Marxism of the 19th century and the Leninism associated with it.  I have used this term Cultural Marxism along with other terms – socialism, secular humanism.  Basically it is a political ideology, a set of ideas, antithetical to traditional, Judeo-Christian beliefs and ideas predominant in this country up until the middle of last century.

Daily Bell: So what happened in the middle of the last century that is accredited to this change?

Pat Buchanan: The revolutions of the 1960s. They began within the mainstream of American thought – the civil rights revolution, anti-war protests – but degenerated into more alien ideas.  The anti-Vietnam protests degenerated into anti-Americanism, the belief the United States was on the wrong side in the Cold War.  The marches and demonstrations began with "Let's get out of Vietnam" and ended with "Ho, Ho, Ho Chi Minh; the NLF is going to win." The fight for civil rights ended in demands for quotas, affirmative action, set-asides and an entirely different country. 

The feminist revolution that began with a desire of women for equal opportunity in academia and the job market degenerated into a clamor for sexual liberation and abortion on demand.  And all of these things are part of a great revolution that has put down roots and been extremely successful in converting a significant slice of the country, and capturing half of the elite. I don't think we can reverse this revolution. I think it's divided us permanently and I don't think we are going back to being one nation and one people again.
David Ben-Gurion imagines the future

Revolution from Above
By Kerry Bolton
Quick Overview
Dr. Kerry Bolton shows how the supposed competition between Marxism and capitalism are, and have been, a fallacy, and that in fact they work together in close collusion.
Product Description
In Revolution from Above, Dr. Bolton demonstrates that the supposed rivalry between Marxist-inspired movements and capitalism has always been an illusion. Marxism, Communism and liberalism have been and continue to be exploited by the forces of international capitalism to further their global agenda, despite their surface disagreements. Dr. Bolton shows that the ultimate goal of capitalism is to create a worldwide collectivist society of consumers, and Marxism is merely one means of attaining this. He traces this idea back to Plato, through the Illuminati, the Freemasons, the French Revolution, and Communism, and examines the evidence for the existence of a shadowy network of bankers who control a large portion of the world's political and economic power. He then discusses the various instruments this network uses to maintain control, such as tax-exempt foundations and think tanks. Dr. Bolton also reveals how capitalist governments actually worked closely with Communist regimes and, in fact, frustrated genuinely anti-Communist efforts during the Cold War. He discusses the impact this has had on Western society, resulting in such trends as the sexual revolution and the promotion of drug use. Dr. Bolton then brings us up-to-date by discussing the role of the recent 'Arab spring' in these ongoing developments. One will never be able to view modern history the same way again after reading Dr. Bolton's arguments and examining the supporting evidence.
Table of Contents
1. Capitalist and Marxist Dialectics
2. Plato: Father of Collectivism
3. Abolishing the Family — Primary Obstacle to Tyranny
4. Socialism for the Super-Rich
5. Huxley’s Brave New World
6. Revolution from Above
7. Revolution by Stealth
8. Revolution by Degeneracy
9. New Left from Old
10. Scenarios for Crises and Control
11. The 'Global Democratic Revolution'
12. 'Total World Planning'

The Left - "Useful Idiots" of the Rich
The Anglo Saxon Mission
The Third World War and the Inheritance of the New World
By Brother Nathanael Kapner
ALL OF CHRISTENDOM and the Western World is now in the hands of a trans-national American Jewry.

At the close of WWII, American Jewry succeeded in not only in subjugating Germany to itself but brought Great Britain and the entire European continent under its thrall.

Now, with the Nato US/Jewish proxy war machine takeover of Libya with the rest of Africa soon to fall under Judaic command which controls all the checkpoints of worldwide commerce - natural resources - emerging markets - gold price-fixing - and trade — it is safe to say that American Jewry is indeed a “global regime.”

Once Napoleon opened the doors to Jewish influence by granting civil rights to the Jews in the early 19th Century — with the rest of Europe following suit — the die was cast for Jewry to stamp its monolithic mark upon every aspect of the infrastructure of the Western World.

Expanded is Mayer Rothschild’s boast: “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes her laws,” to encompass the entire globe.

That “control” is centered in Washington and New York via the Jewish-owned Federal Reserve Bank and its attendant Jewish investment banks.

But its network connects to and from London, Paris, Frankfurt, and Shanghai via the Rothschild dynasty. American Jewry with its strangle hold on US political and financial life is indeed a Global regime.


AMERICAN JEWRY’S STRENGTH lies in its racial solidarity. And this affinity extends beyond the shores of America.

Thus, loyalty to their own racial group supersedes fidelity to “Yankeeland” where American Jewry resides and operates.

This all-encompassing solidarity which glues Jewry together is illustrated by observing the “international” connections which unite American Jewish organizations with those abroad:

1. American Jewish Congress
1a. World Jewish Congress

2. American Zionist Movement
2a. World Zionist Movement

3. American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)
3a. Jewish Agency of Israel (Chairman is James Tisch who serves on the NY Fed)

4. American Association Of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists
4a. International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists

5. Anti-Defamation League of America
5a. B’nai Brith International (Parent of ADL)

6. US Holocaust Memorial
6a. Berlin Holocaust Memorial

7. Federal Reserve Bank of America
7a. Rothschild Group International (Principal shareholder of the Fed)


THE ARGUMENT IS MADE that history has proven that all “undesirable regimes” have eventually been “toppled” and thus American Jewry will fall like all the others.

But the toppling of undesirable regimes has only occurred in nations which had limited and demarcated boundaries within which those ruling-entities reigned.

This is certainly NOT the case with regard to the rule of the invisible governance of American Jewry — (not so “invisible” to the astute observer) — whose reach extends to all the transnational components of globalization and international governing bodies such as the Jewish-operated IMF and World Bank.

Indeed, American Jewry IS a global regime and any attempts to “topple” this imperialist dynasty would be impossible…whether by the ballot, uprisings, or revolutions. (History has borne this out when the Jews enlisted the entire world to prevent Germany from having a nation of its own.)

Only perhaps the military could bring about this much hoped-for event.

But even a military coup aimed at halting the advance of global Jewry is unlikely since the US military is dependent on Jewish Financial Capital, (which includes the underwriting and influence of the armaments industry as well as ownership of the Federal Reserve), for its funding, salaries, and perks.

And besides, all the true patriots of the US military have either been killed, replaced, or forced to resign.

CAN AMERICAN JEWRY with its global ties be stopped?

How can it possibly be halted when a One World Governance, (complete with a new international reserve currency in the makings), of which American Jewry is joined at-the-hip with Jewish bankers in its oversight, is now in place?

Only an act of God—or a Ron Paul presidency—or a combination of the two, can STOP the tyranny wielded by the global boot of American Jewry.

One U.S. family responsible for half of Netanyahu’s donations

Revere’s Ride
Enemy Expatriation Act (HR 3166) is the final link in our chain of bondage
Global Science: 10 Theses For A Scientific Conception Of The 21st Century
(February 2010)
Dianetics is a set of ideas and practices regarding the metaphysical relationship between the mind and body that was invented by the science fiction author L. Ron Hubbard and is practiced by followers of Scientology. Hubbard coined Dianetics from the Greek stems dia, meaning through, and nous, meaning mind.

Dianetics explores the existence of a mind with three parts: the conscious "analytical mind," the subconscious "reactive mind", and the somatic mind. The goal of Dianetics is to remove the "reactive mind", which Scientologists believe prevents people from becoming more ethical, more aware, happier and saner. The Dianetics procedure to achieve this is called "auditing". Auditing is a process whereby a series of questions are asked by the Scientology auditor, in an attempt to rid the auditee of the painful experiences of the past which scientologists believe to be the cause of the "reactive mind".

Dianetics grew out of Hubbard's personal experiences and experiments and has been described as a mix of "Western technology and Oriental philosophy". Hubbard stated that Dianetics "forms a bridge between" cybernetics and General Semantics, a set of ideas about education originated by Alfred Korzybski that was receiving much attention in the science fiction world in the 1940s. Hubbard claimed that Dianetics can increase intelligence, eliminate unwanted emotions and alleviate a wide range of illnesses he believed to be psychosomatic. Among the conditions purportedly treated against are arthritis, allergies, asthma, some coronary difficulties, eye trouble, ulcers, migraine headaches, sex deviations and even death. Hubbard variously defined Dianetics as "a spiritual healing technology" and "an organized science of thought.”

Dianetics predates Hubbard's classification of Scientology as "applied religious philosophy". Early in 1951, he expanded his writings to include teachings related to the soul, or "thetan". Dianetics is also practiced by independent groups, collectively called the Free Zone. The Church of Scientology disapproves of Free Zone activities and has prosecuted them in court for misappropriation of Scientology/Dianetics copyrights and trademarks.

Dianetics has achieved no acceptance as a scientific theory and scientists cite Dianetics as an example of a pseudoscience (see below).
The Serpent Seedline
Edomite Jews and the Sons of Cain
By Sherry Shriner
Washington Post / On Faith
Mormons a ‘distinctive’ people
By Patrick Mason
Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog
Napoleon Bonaparte belonged to haplogroup E1b1b1c1* (E-M34*)
This paper describes the finding of the determination of the Y-haplogroup of French Emperor Napoléon I (Napoléon Bonaparte). DNA was extracted from two islands of follicular sheaths located at the basis of two of his beard hairs, conserved in the Vivant Denon reliquary. The Y-haplogroup of Napoléon I, determined by the study of 10 NRY-SNPs (non-recombinant Y-single nucleotide polymorphisms), is E1b1b1c1*. Charles Napoléon, the current collateral male descendant of Napoléon I, belongs to this same Y-haplogroup; his Y-STR profile was determined by using a set of 37 NRY-STRs (non-recombinant Y-microsatellites).
EIR Volume 25, Number 4, January 23, 1998
Tibet’s Llamas: The Old and the New
By Michael O. Billington and Paul B. Gallagher
Regulating Religion: The Courts and the Free Exercise Clause
By Catharine Clarkson
Jurisprudence regarding the "free exercise of religion" clause of the U.S. Constitution is in a state of confusion. There has been a series of rapid changes in the standard used by the Supreme Court to determine when a statute impermissibly restricts free exercise. The trend is now towards greater acceptance of government claims about the importance of regulation over religious practices. Here, Cookson challenges the wisdom of this judicial drift, and its false dichotomy between anarchy and a system that respects religious freedom. In its place she offers a new, practical approach to resolving free exercise conflicts that could be used in both federal and state courts. Cookson shows the reader how violations of religious freedom affect the community whose values are at stake.
"In this worthy book [Catherine Cookson] makes a compelling case for a casuistical approach to church-state jurisprudence having to do with free exercise cases."--H-NET

"Beautifully written and argued it is rare to find a book on religion and the Constitution in the United States that brings such ideologically unencumbered care and intelligence to the issue. Cookson's reading of the major Supreme Court cases is fresh and smart."- The Journal of Religion
From the Inside Flap
Our only choice as a nation, we are told, is either authoritarianism or anarchy. We are told that the "rule of law" is threatened if the "spirit of the law" is considered. After fifty years of careful scrutiny of laws that interfere with religious practices, the current U.S. Supreme Court announced that the good order of society uniformly requires that a general law trump religious obligations. In this book, Catharine Cookson challenges the wisdom of this judicial drift, and its false dichotomy between anarchy and order. In its place she offers the process of casuistry, a method of reasoning grounded within the legal tradition as well as social ethics. Cookson treats free exercise cases as conflicts of principles, in which the context must be carefully considered, and both sides carry burdens of proof. The Western Christian tradition on freedom of conscience is the basic source for appropriate principles and paradigms, and the book discusses the four main types of approaches: two kingdoms, levitical, duly-ordered authority, and enlightenment. Chapters on the Native American Church, and on parents' use of spiritual healing methods on children, illustrate the casuistical free exercise process.
Oxford University Press
Regulating Religion
The Courts and the Free Exercise Clause
By Catharine Cookson
The Guardian
Religion for Atheists by Alain de Botton - review
A banal and impudent argument for the uses of religion

The novels of Graham Greene are full of reluctant Christians, men and women who would like to be rid of God but find themselves stuck with him like some lethal addiction. There are, however, reluctant atheists as well, people who long to dunk themselves in the baptismal font but can't quite bring themselves to believe. George Steiner and Roger Scruton have both been among this company at various stages of their careers. The agnostic philosopher Simon Critchley, who currently has a book in the press entitled The Faith of the Faithless, is one of a whole set of leftist thinkers today (Slavoj Žižek, Alain Badiou, Giorgio Agamben) whose work draws deeply on Christian theology. In this respect, the only thing that distinguishes them from the Pope is that they don't believe in God. It is rather like coming across a banker who doesn't believe in profit.
Such reluctant non-belief goes back a long way. Machiavelli thought religious ideas, however vacuous, were a useful way of terrorising the mob. Voltaire rejected the God of Christianity, but was anxious not to infect his servants with his own scepticism. Atheism was fine for the elite, but might breed dissent among the masses. The 18th-century Irish philosopher John Toland, who was rumoured to be the bastard son of a prostitute and a spoilt priest, clung to a "rational" religion himself, but thought the rabble should stick with their superstitions. There was one God for the rich and another for the poor. Edward Gibbon, one of the most notorious sceptics of all time, held that the religious doctrines he despised could still be socially useful. So does the German philosopher Jurgen Habermas today.
Diderot, a doyen of the French Enlightenment, wrote that the Christian gospel might have been a less gloomy affair if Jesus had fondled the breasts of the bridesmaids at Cana and caressed the buttocks of St John. Yet he, too, believed that religion was essential for social unity. Matthew Arnold feared the spread of godlessness among the Victorian working class. It could be countered, he thought, with a poeticised form of a Christianity in which he himself had long ceased to believe. The 19th-century French philosopher Auguste Comte, an out-and-out materialist, designed an ideal society complete with secular versions of God, priests, sacraments, prayer and feast days.

There is something deeply disingenuous about this whole tradition. "I don't believe myself, but it is politically prudent that you should" is the slogan of thinkers supposedly devoted to the integrity of the intellect. If the Almighty goes out of the window, how are social order and moral self-discipline to be maintained? It took the barefaced audacity of Friedrich Nietzsche to point out that if God was dead, then so was Man – or at least the conception of humanity favoured by the guardians of social order. The problem was not so much that God had inconveniently expired; it was that men and women were cravenly pretending that he was still alive, and thus refusing to revolutionise their idea of themselves.

God may be dead, but Alain de Botton's Religion for Atheists is a sign that the tradition from Voltaire to Arnold lives on. The book assumes that religious beliefs are a lot of nonsense, but that they remain indispensable to civilised existence. One wonders how this impeccably liberal author would react to being told that free speech and civil rights were all bunkum, but that they had their social uses and so shouldn't be knocked. Perhaps he might have the faintest sense of being patronised. De Botton claims that one can be an atheist while still finding religion "sporadically useful, interesting and consoling", which makes it sound rather like knocking up a bookcase when you are feeling a bit low. Since Christianity requires one, if need be, to lay down one's life for a stranger, he must have a strange idea of consolation. Like many an atheist, his theology is rather conservative and old-fashioned.
De Botton does not want people literally to believe, but he remains a latter-day Matthew Arnold, as his high Victorian language makes plain. Religion "teaches us to be polite, to honour one another, to be faithful and sober", as well as instructing us in "the charms of community". It all sounds tediously neat and civilised. This is not quite the gospel of a preacher who was tortured and executed for speaking up for justice, and who warned his comrades that if they followed his example they would meet with the same fate. In De Botton's well-manicured hands, this bloody business becomes a soothing form of spiritual therapy, able to "promote morality (and) engender a spirit of community". It is really a version of the Big Society.
Like Comte, De Botton believes in the need for a host of "consoling, subtle or just charming rituals" to restore a sense of community in a fractured society. He even envisages a new kind of restaurant in which strangers would be forced to sit together and open up their hearts to one another. There would be a Book of Agape on hand, which would instruct diners to speak to each other for prescribed lengths of time on prescribed topics. Quite how this will prevent looting and rioting is not entirely clear.

In Comtist style, De Botton also advocates secular versions of such sacred events as the Jewish Day of Atonement, the Catholic Mass and the Zen Buddhist tea ceremony. It is surprising he does not add Celtic versus Rangers. He is also keen on erecting billboards that carry moral or spiritual rather than commercial messages, perhaps (one speculates) in the style of "Leave Young Ladies Alone" or "Tortoises Have Feelings As Well". It is an oddly Orwellian vision for a self-proclaimed libertarian. Religious faith is reduced to a set of banal moral tags. We are invited to contemplate St Joseph in order to learn "how to face the trials of the workplace with a modest and uncomplaining temper". Not even the Walmart management have thought of that one. As a role model for resplendent virtue, we are offered not St Francis of Assisi but Warren Buffett.
What the book does, in short, is hijack other people's beliefs, empty them of content and redeploy them in the name of moral order, social consensus and aesthetic pleasure. It is an astonishingly impudent enterprise. It is also strikingly unoriginal. Liberal-capitalist societies, being by their nature divided, contentious places, are forever in search of a judicious dose of communitarianism to pin themselves together, and a secularised religion has long been one bogus solution on offer. The late Christopher Hitchens, who some people think is now discovering that his broadside God Is Not Great was slightly off the mark, would have scorned any such project. He did not consider that religion was a convenient fiction. He thought it was disgusting. Now there's something believers can get their teeth into …

Terry Eagleton's Why Marx Was Right is published by Yale.
Greek Words for Love
Temple of Minerva Medica (nymphaeum)
John Hogue Prophecy
Noah’s Ark Of Consciousness
Behind The Cosmic Veil
A New Vision of Reality Merging Science, the Spiritual and the Supernatural
Authored by Thomas P. Fusco
Thomas P. Fulco: Behind the Cosmic Veil
Rise of the Archons
An interview with Jay Weidner on Rense Radio
Jewish Virtual Library
Ten Commandments
Talmud of Jmmanuel’s Genuineness
The dating and genuineness of an ancient text is customarily investigated or affirmed through radiocarbon dating and paleography -- comparing its writing style with that of known ancient documents, and by noting the type of paper or parchment it is written on and its degree of aging. Without the originals, as in the case of the Talmud of Jmmanuel (TJ), one has only its surviving co-discoverer's word that it had been in the form of four rolls of writing, whose leaves were somewhat crumbly in places despite the resin encasement surrounding the leather in which they had been preserved. However, this is much more than scholars have to go on with respect to their studies of the New Testament gospels, for example, for which neither the originals nor their first translations or copies, nor their second copies... exist, and for which of course no eyewitness testimony exists. Thus the genuineness of the TJ has to be determined through indirect means. The question as to whether or not it could be a hoax then may continually arise.
Weapons of Mass Destruction Found
(An Address to the Dead)

By Michael Tsarion

◊ ◊ ◊

    I rejected that hardened, sullen-tempered Pharaoh of England forever...and disdain the wretch - Thomas Paine (Diatribe against King George III)
The "WAR ON TERRA" is merely the latest move in the great game played out by the Atonist Establishment - the Royals and Jesuit-Masonic sorcerers - who expertly employ the "Ordo ab Chao" (Order from Chaos) methodology to further their very personal aspirations that date back to an old world order that you are not supposed to know about.
So let's get clear on a few things, and remain sane in the midst of growing worldwide insanity. Let's understand that the present day architects of control (those biological and ideological descendants of the Atonist pharaohs of old, and their less camera shy lieutenants) continue plying their vile imperialist trade from behind the visible governments and religions of the world.
Let's understand that the "Israeli-Palestinian" conflict is engineered from London and New York by elites with ancient origins. Age after age, they concoct bogus conflicts to engender an ambience of fear and paranoia, and to ensure that few of you ever become aware of humanity's true enemies. The Islamic "extremists" are funded by the same hidden hand that fund the Zionists and the Fundamentalist Christian Evangelists. But that is information given out on a "need to know" basis.
Many a great thinker has managed to work out what has been going on behind the scenes, and it's time for you to adjust your settings and get the picture, and quick!
    Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing tactics, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception - Mark Twain
Israel, dear people - the real Israel - has little to do with religious Jews or the Torah, just as the true Christ has little to do with Vatican-style Christianity or American Evangelism. But you have not worked this out yet, have you? No, of course not. After all, you've have been "Mel Gibsoned" and "Pat Robertzoned" to death, and are mentally infected by many a deadly pathogen, the worst of which is ignorance.

Michael Tsarion - Age of Manipulation
Free Masonry and Judaism - Michael Tsarion - Red Ice
Mask of Zion
“There is no light like truth; no darkness like falsehood. There is no freedom like knowledge; no slavery like ignorance." ~ Jonathan Azaziah
The Salala Massacre: NATO’s Naked Aggression Against Pakistan And The Hegemonic Israeli-Indo-American Strategy Behind It
Decoding the Past - Secrets of the Kabbalah
(Video Tutorial)
Free Individual
"If you are waiting for the government to change, or society to change, or for some program or movement to be successful to find freedom, you will never be free."
A Sign of Very Bad Things to Come

You may never have heard of the SEA, and may not believe it when I tell you what it is. I am not making this up. The SEA is the "Sewage Enforcement Agency."
The, "Cambria County Sewage Enforcement Agency," protecting society from two dangerous Amish outhouse operators, apprehended them for violating Pennsylvania state sewage laws. They "were sentenced Thursday to 90 days in jail."
Their crime? "Andy Swartzentruber and Sam Yoder do not have permits for outhouses at a school and have been disposing of waste "improperly." The fact that this is how the Amish have done this for hundreds of years, and no one noticed it was "improper" until now is more than a little suspicious—that they would suddenly be threatened with jail over this is downright vicious.
It was not long ago I said I would know things had finally become intolerable in America when it was the Amish that were being targeted. I expected the issue would be one of schooling and endangering children. The actual issue is close to that, and I will not be surprised when it's turned into an excuse to remove the children of the Amish, to protect them from vicious sewage law violators, on some pretence like, "health concerns."

Not Possible?

There was a time when such an outrage would have been unthinkable in this country. That was a time when people prized individual liberty above all things and regarded the lives and liberty of others sacred, not to be violated by anyone. It was a time when most people were proud to be responsible for themselves, self-reliant, independent, and decent. Such people minded their own business and minded it well, and would have regarded any intrusion into the private lives of others a gross indecency.

You may be one who still holds those values; your initial reaction to this story may have been the same as mine—why can't people just mind their own business. What kind of person could bring themselves to harass these people who want nothing from anyone but to be left alone. They harm no one and ask nothing of anybody.

John Quade
Dallas Texas Seminar March 1996 From The American Jural Society

The Spiritual-Industrial Complex
By John P. Herzog
Herbert Brownell, Jr.
Herbert Brownell, Jr. (February 20, 1904 – May 1, 1996) was the Attorney General of the United States in President Eisenhower's cabinet from 1953 to 1957.

Early life

Brownell, one of the seven children of Herbert and May Miller Brownell, was born in Peru, Nebraska. His father was a professor at the University of Nebraska, Teachers College in education and physical sciences as well as an author. His brother, Samuel Brownell, became U.S. Commissioner of Education. After graduating Phi Beta Kappa from the University of Nebraska in 1924, and, in his senior year, being a member of the Society of Innocents, he attended Yale Law School, earning his law degree in 1927. While at the University of Nebraska he joined The Delta Upsilon Fraternity.

Susan B. Anthony was Herbert Brownell's cousin.


Brownell was admitted to the bar in New York, and began his practice in New York City. In February 1929, he joined the law firm of Lord Day & Lord in New York, and except for periods of public service remained with them until his retirement in 1989. He married Doris McCarter on June 16, 1934. They had four children and remained together until she died on June 12, 1979. He married again in 1987 to the former Mrs. Marion Taylor, but the couple separated in December, 1989, and was divorced.

Besides his law practice, Brownell had a long and active political career as a Republican. He was elected to the New York State Assembly in 1932, and served there from 1933 to 1937. In 1942, he was the campaign manager for Thomas E. Dewey's election as Governor of New York. He also managed Dewey's 1944 and 1948 campaigns for president. From 1944 to 1946 he was Chairman of the Republican National Committee, where he focused on modernizing the RNC with advanced polling methods and fundraising techniques. He was credited by many as being instrumental in helping the Republicans gain control of the United States Congress in the 1946 off-year elections.

Political career

He was instrumental in convincing General Dwight D. Eisenhower to run for President of the United States, and worked in Eisenhower's 1952 campaign. Eisenhower appointed him as Attorney General on January 21, 1953 and he served until November 8, 1957. Early in his term, he was involved in several landmark civil rights cases, including Brown v. Board of Education. Although it was weakened by the United States Senate, he drafted the legislative proposal that ultimately became the Civil Rights Act of 1957, which was the first civil rights law enacted in over 80 years. Because of his strong stance in favor of civil rights, Brownell became very unpopular in the South. Eisenhower wished to nominate Brownell to the Supreme Court when vacancies occurred in 1957 and 1958, but felt he could not because segregationists in the Senate would fight and defeat the nomination.

Brownell later served as the United States representative to the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, and in 1972-1974 as a special U.S. envoy to Mexico for negotiations over the Colorado River.

In addition to many honors and other civic roles, Brownell was President of the New York City Bar Association in 1982. From 1986 to 1989 he served on the Commission for the Bicentennial of the United States Constitution. He died of cancer in New York City on May 1, 1996, aged 92.

Susan Brownell Anthony
Susan Brownell Anthony (February 15, 1820 – March 13, 1906) was a prominent American civil rights leader who played a pivotal role in the 19th century women's rights movement to introduce women's suffrage into the United States. She was co-founder of the first Women's Temperance Movement with Elizabeth Cady Stanton as President. She also co-founded the women's rights journal, The Revolution. She traveled the United States and Europe, and averaged 75 to 100 speeches per year. She was one of the important advocates in leading the way for women's rights to be acknowledged and instituted in the American government.
Working Moms Only is the world’s leading website and newsletter for the empowerment of the working moms.
Our mission is to supply the tools that can give EVERY working mom the ability to lead a healthy, wealthy, and more balanced/blended lifestyle. To create a community where millions of working moms from all over the world come together in support and celebration of each other.
Working moms have more influence on what our world will look like in the future than any other single group of people. Their responsibilities are endless. Working moms deserved to be respected, honored, and praised for our contribution to society.
Please join us on this magnificent journey to lead the life you have always dreamed of, the life you and your family deserve.
Santorum’s Communist Clan
Evangelical Leaders Throw Support Behind Santorum
Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum has received a powerful shot in the arm as top US evangelical leaders endorsed his White House bid ahead of a crucial South Carolina primary.
The endorsement came after about 150 influential Christian conservative leaders met at a ranch outside of Houston, Texas, in hopes of rallying their forces around one candidate before the January 21 vote in the state where evangelicals and social conservatives make up 60 percent of the Republican electorate.
Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council and one of the organizers of the meeting, said Santorum, a former US senator from Pennsylvania, had received 85 out of 114 possible votes, thus securing the backing of the group.
The endorsement includes financial support from key religious conservative groups, Perkins explained Saturday without offering specifics. Participants included James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family; Kelly Shackelford, president and CEO of the Liberty Institute; Don Wildmon, founder of the American Family Association; and Gary Bauer, president of American Values.
“You will see these organizations engaging openly on his behalf – especially in the state of South Carolina,” Perkins told reporters. “We believe that with strong consensus coming behind him that can aid in the fundraising that he will need to be successful in the primary.”
Santorum finished a close second in the Iowa caucuses earlier this month, losing to frontrunner Mitt Romney only by eight votes. He was tied for fourth place with former House of Representatives speaker Newt Gingrich in New Hampshire.
Many social conservatives perceive Romney, a former Massachusetts governor, as a moderate and question his commitment to priority issues such as opposition to abortion and gay marriages.
But not everyone is convinced the endorsement will help Santorum defeat Romney.
The Reverend Robert Jeffress of First Baptist Church in Dallas, Texas, believes the summit has just exposed the fault lines among religious conservatives.
"The real division is between the idealists who are looking for the right president, anybody but Romney, and the pragmatists who don't want to cut off their access to the next president, who they think will be Romney," Jeffress told The Philadelphia Inquirer.
Meanwhile, Romney's team hit back Saturday at President Barack Obama's campaign for portraying him as a jobs destroyer.
Romney, favorite to take on Obama in November, sought to turn the tables on the Democratic president, with a senior campaign aide saying the candidate's business experience trumped Obama's background as a "community organizer."
"No amount of speechmaking will persuade the American people that his economic record has been anything other than an unmitigated disaster," Romney's policy director Lanhee Chen said of Obama in a statement.
Attacks by Obama aides on Romney's economic credentials on Friday added to similar outbursts from the latter's Republican rivals over his 15-year tenure at equity firm Bain Capital and disputed claims that he created 100,000 jobs.
The Obama campaign's intervention whipped up a new storm around Romney, who has been battered by the jobs debate, in which he has been repeatedly accused of firing thousands of workers while securing millions in profits for himself.
But Chen laid the economic blame at Obama's door, stating that the number of Americans unemployed, underemployed or no longer seeking work had risen from 22 million people to nearly 24 million during the incumbent's reign.
"In January 2009, the month President Obama assumed office, the total US public debt outstanding was $10.4 trillion. Today it exceeds more than $15 trillion," Chen added.
"The American people are all too well aware that this is money that they must eventually pay back."
A poll released late Friday gave Romney a slim lead in South Carolina.
Public Policy Polling (PPP) gave Romney 29 percent of the vote, former House speaker Newt Gingrich received 24 percent, and libertarian candidate Ron Paul 15 percent.
Santorum, seen as much more conservative than Romney, was on 14 percent, with Texas Governor Rick Perry (five percent), and former US ambassador to China Jon Huntsman (one percent) well back in the race.
"Voters there are overwhelmingly focused on the economy this year and that's working to (Romney's) advantage," the pollsters said.
"Asked who they trust most on economic issues, 35 percent pick Romney to 25 percent for Gingrich, 16 percent for Paul, and 10 percent for Santorum," PPP added.
The Romney campaign also Saturday released a video playing up the former Massachusetts governor's pro-life stance on abortion, one of the hot-button issues on which opponents have accused him of being a flip-flopper.

The New Republic
The Communitarian Crush on Rick Santorum
Robert David Steele
Robert David Steele Vivas (b. July 16, 1952 New York City), is known for his promotion of open source intelligence (OSINT). He is a former United States Marine Corps infantry and intelligence officer for twenty years and was the second-ranking civilian (GS-14) in U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence from 1988–1992. Steele is a former clandestine services case officer with the Central Intelligence Agency. He is the founder and CEO of OSS.Net as well as the Golden Candle Society. Steele also was a member of the Adjunct Faculty of Marine Corps University in the mid-1990s. He's the son of an "oil man" as he said in a previous interview.
Steele is a candidate for the Reform Party's nomination for President of the United States in the 2012 presidential election.

Reason TV / Matt Welch
Policing is Too Important to be Left to the Government: Economist Ed Stringham



"Then Jesus said: ... 'And you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free.'" John 8:31-32
The first casualty in war is truth.
As my history teacher in Rhodesia reminded us: Beware the victor's version!
As early as 1930, John Dewey observed that: We are exposed to the greatest flood of mass suggestion that any people has yet experienced.
Propaganda is to Democracies what violence is to Dictatorships.
Propaganda, the calculated manipulation of public opinion to serve political and ideological interests, is pervasive. We are also exposed to commercial propaganda: Marketing and Advertising.
Propaganda aims to do other people's thinking for them.
Propaganda today has moved into prop-agenda, not only controlling what we think, but how we think, and what we think about.
Propaganda uses highly selective images, devious and prejudicial language. Dubious linkages, confusing issues and distorting reality with disinformation, is a daily reality.
George Orwell wrote: In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
Karl Marx declared: The first battlefield is the rewriting of history.
Vladimir Lenin - Propaganda and Agitation

In his book, What is to be Done, published in 1902, Vladimir Lenin defined propaganda as the use of historical and scientific arguments to indoctrinate the educated and intelligent masses. Agitation was described by Lenin as the use of slogans, stories and selective half-truths to exploit the grievances of the un-educated and ignorant masses.
Deceit is Justified

Every unit of the Communist Party was to have an Agit-Prop section. Deceit in propaganda is justified because the end justifies the means. As Vladimir Lenin regularly said: Treaties are like pie crusts, made to be broken. To tell the truth is a petty bourgeois habit, but to lie and to lie convincingly is a sign of superior intelligence.
The End Justifies the Means

The aim of propaganda is to rally people behind a cause. If this requires exaggerating, misrepresenting, or even lying about the issues, in order to gain that support, the end justifies the means.
Tactics of Propaganda

Common tactics used in propaganda are:
1.          Ignoring the historic context
2.          Using selective stories
3.          Utilising a narrow source of experts, those who tow the party line
4.          Demonising the enemy and
5.          Using a narrow focus (the zoom lens, rather than the wide angle lens of context.)
Truth Surrounded by Lies

Sir Winston Churchill, the British prime minister during World War II declared: In war time, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies.
Propaganda in America

Mark Twain, in 1916, described the rise of propaganda in America: Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception.
Nazi Propaganda

Many people know that Joseph Goebbels used propaganda to advance the aims of the Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler. What few people realise is that Nazi propaganda was based and modelled upon Allied propaganda against Germany in WWI. Joseph Goebbels was an ardent student of American public relations pioneer Edward Bernays.
Psychology and Social Science

Bernays based his methodology on the social science researches of French psychologist Gustav Le Bon in his 1895 book: The Psychology of the Crowd; and on Sigmund Freud's 1922 book: The Analysis of the Ego and Group Psychology, as well as the research of Russian experimental psychologist Ivan Pavlov, as published in his 1926 book: Conditioned Reflexes.
The Committee on Public Information

Edward L. Bernays (1891-1995) was a nephew of Sigmund Freud. Bernays was a theatrical publicist who was employed by George Creel as a propagandist for the Committee on Public Information (CPI). President Woodrow Wilson of the United States, by executive order, created the Committee on Public Information in association with the Military Intelligence Bureau. The CPI was America's propaganda office. The CPI defined propaganda as: The systematic, widespread dissemination, or promotion, of particular ideas, doctrines, or practices, meant to further a particular cause or agenda and weaken that of another. It is a systematic effort to manipulate attitudes, beliefs and actions by the use of symbols.
Hidden Manipulators

German philosopher George Hegel, in his 1821 book: The Philosophy of Right, explained how in democracies the public is manipulated and persuaded by hidden persuaders and hidden manipulators. French author Anatole France, wrote: Democracy is run by an unseen engineer.
Controlling Public Opinion

Bernays based much of his methodology upon the works of Walter Lippmann, who wrote about controlling and managing public opinion. His ideas were later published in Public Opinion (1922) and The Phantom Public (1925).
Enlightening Elites

Walter Lippmann was a member of US Army Military Intelligence during World War I. Lippmann believed that most people are irrational and act chaotically. Because people are unable to independently make rational choices, they need to be guided by a specialised class of enlightened elites. Lippmann described people as: simple minded and sheep-like, incapable of formulating or organising their desires, interests and wishes. Therefore enlightened elites can lead and educate the masses. As Lippmann put it: Making of one general will out of a multitude of general wishes. Bernays stated: The public must be regimented.
Mobilising Hate and War

In 1927, Harold D. Lasswell, a professor in Political Science at the University of Chicago, analysed the propaganda techniques employed by the Allies in WWI: A new and subtler instrument must weld thousands and even millions of human beings into one amalgamated mass of hate and war and hope... propaganda. It is the new dynamic of society... the fact remains that propaganda is one of the most powerful instrumentalities in the modern world. Propaganda is a reflex to the immensity, the rationality and the woefulness of the modern world. Lasswell explained that to: Mobilise the hatred of the people against their enemy, represent the opposing nation as a menacing, murderous aggressor... represent the opposing nation as satanic; it violates all the moral standards...
Objectives of Propaganda

Lasswell identified four major objectives of Propaganda:
1.          To mobilise hatred against the enemy who must be de-humanised, portrayed as barbaric, brutal, cruel and uncivilised.
2.          To preserve the friendship of Allies.
3.          To preserve the friendship, and if possible, to procure the cooperation of neutrals; and
4.          To demoralise the enemy.
Warning Against War

Before being elected as a candidate for peace in the Presidential Elections of 1916, Woodrow Wilson warned: Lead this people into war, and they'll forget there was ever such a thing as tolerance. To fight, you must be brutal and ruthless, and the spirit of ruthless brutality will enter into the very fibre of national life, infecting the congress, the courts, the policeman on the beat, the man in the street. In January of 1916, Wilson stated: This is a government of the people and this people is not going to choose war.
Reversal of Policy

After being elected, under the slogan of he has kept us out of the war, Woodrow Wilson established the Committee on Public Information which forged the nation (which was overwhelmingly opposed to intervention) into a situation where, if anyone believed that America's entry into Europe's war was a mistake, then they were branded a traitor!
Changing Perspectives

More than 8 million German-Americans lived in the USA and many were sympathetic to the cause of their homeland. One third of Americans were immigrants. Most Americans were not connected to the European conflict by blood, or capital and were not interested in waging war overseas. The Committee on Public Information (CPI) developed into the most formidable propaganda apparatus in history. A muck-raking journalist, George Creel, was appointed to lead the CPI. With a phenomenal budget, the CPI recruited from the best of business, media, academia and the art world. The CPI blended advertising techniques with a sophisticated understanding of human psychology.
Democratic Propaganda

It was the first time that a modern government disseminated propaganda on such a large scale. Although propaganda came to be linked with totalitarian regimes such as the Soviet Union and Red China, it is a fact of history that it first emerged in a democratic state. Although, as a journalist, George Creel had been an outspoken critic of censorship, the CPI immediately took steps to limit conflicting information. With the Espionage Act and Sedition Act Voluntary Guidelines were enforced on the news media and ensured that the mass media in the United States was flooded with pro-war material and perspectives. On any given week more than 20,000 newspaper columns were filled with material gleaned from CPI press releases.
Mobilising the Masses

The CPI created a Division of Syndicated Features and recruited the help of leading novelists, short story writers and essayists to present the pro-war position in popular digestible format, reaching 12 million readers a month. The Division of Pictorial Publicity had at its disposal the most talented advertising illustrators and cartoonists of the time. Powerful posters painted in patriotic colours presented compelling images throughout the country. The poster propaganda motivated millions to enlist in the army and navy or buy Liberty bonds. The Division of Films ensured that the war was promoted in the cinema. The Hollywood film industry wholeheartedly supported the war effort with movie titles like: The Kaiser - The Beast of Berlin, Wolves of Kultur, To Hell with the Kaiser andPerishing's Crusaders!
Propaganda Changes Attitudes

The cause of the Allies was creatively publicised in every available communication channel, including pulpits. Lasswell pointed out that propaganda wins wars, with words, pictures, songs, parades and many similar devices... by the manipulation of collective attitudes.
Emotional Appeal

CPI propaganda showed the way for future propaganda agencies by appealing to the heart, not the mind. Emotional agitation and skilful manipulation made use of manufactured atrocity stories and simplistic slogans such as: Make the world safe for Democracy! Will Irwin, a member of the CPI, wrote after the war: We never told the whole truth - not by any manner of means. G. S. Viereck quoted a Military Intelligence officer who declared: You can't tell them the truth. Victories were routinely manufactured by American military authorities, while defeats were suppressed. Dishonesty was encouraged.

The analysts attributed the failure of German propaganda in America to the fact that: It emphasised logic over passion. As Count von Bernstorff observed: The outstanding characteristic of the average American is rather a great, though superficial, sentimentality. The factual German Press releases failed to grasp this.
Altering Perceptions

As Lasswell observed: So great are the psychological resistances to war in modern nations that every war must appear to be a war of defence against a menacing, murderous aggressor. There must be no ambiguity about who the public is to hate.
Made Up Atrocity Stories

Bernays openly admitted that he and his colleagues used made-up stories to provoke the hate and fear necessary to raise war-bonds and recruits for the war. Some of their stories, such as a bathtub full of eyeballs and children being killed by the enemy were actually recycled stories from previous conflicts.
Propaganda Kills

So effective was the anti-German propaganda of the CPI in the USA that Dachshunds had to be renamed, 14 states banned the teaching, or speaking, of German in their public schools. Mobs assaulted American immigrants from Germany. At least one man, Robert Prager, a German coal miner, was lynched by an angry mob in Illinois.
Appealing to Idealists

The CPI recognised that while emotional appeals and simplistic stereotypes of the enemy could influence many, the intellectuals and pacifists needed different motivation. To them American military intervention in Europe was described as: a campaign to end warfare forever and establish a league of nations. To industrialists the war was modified as a conflict to destroy the competition of German industry. The propagandist does not need to ask if it is true, but merely, does it work?
The Value of Propaganda in Peacetime

In the final months of 1918, a war-weary American public ousted the Democrats who had led them into WWI. The Republican majority in Congress brought the CPI under increasing scrutiny. The director of CPI's foreign division later reported: The history of propaganda in the war would scarcely be worthy of consideration here, but for one fact - it did not stop with the Armistice. No indeed! The methods invented and tried out in war were too valuable for the uses of governments, factions and special interests.
Regimenting the Public Mind

Edward Bernays took the techniques he had learnt in the CPI to Madison Avenue and became an outspoken proponent of propaganda as a tool for democratic governments. It was of course the astounding success of propaganda during the war that opened the eyes of the intelligent few in all departments of life to the possibilities of regimenting the public mind. (Propaganda, by Edward Bernays, 1928)
Subverting Society

Most Americans came to realise that they had been lied to and manipulated by deceit disguised as news. Many sought to pin complete responsibility for America's involvement in the ruinous World War on hate mongering militarists in the CPI. However, as one noted: Ultimately their guilt is less important than the questions their activities raised about the role of propaganda in a democratic society. The whole theory of democratic society was rooted in the belief that free citizens could form their own opinions about the issues of the day to decide their collective destiny. Freedom of speech, freedom of opinion, freedom of association, freedom of thought and freedom of religion are fundamental necessities for any democratic process.
Is Propaganda Compatible with Freedom?

However, during the First World War, America's political leaders decided that their citizens were not making the correct decisions, quickly enough. So they flooded the channels of communication with dishonest messages that were designed to stir up emotions and provoke hatred of their long time trading partner, Germany. The war came to an end. But the propaganda did not. Today many who espouse the ideals of democracy behave like dictators and propagandists. The question is whether propaganda is compatible with freedom. Propaganda clearly undermines a population's ability to think clearly and critically about world events. Simplistic, emotional appeals undermine logic and reason.
Discerning Between Information and Disinformation

Students of propaganda soon noted that while the CPI was the largest propaganda operation to that date, it was not actually the first such deception operation. Shortly after the end of the American Civil War (or War Between the States) journalist Colburn Adams wrote: The future historian of the late war will have a very difficult task to perform... sifting the truth from falsehood as it appears in official records.
Newspaper Wars
Two prominent newspapermen took the credit for leading America into the Spanish-American war of 1898. William Randolf Hearst (1863 -1951), and Joseph Pulitzer, editorially clamoured for US military intervention against Spain. Through disinformation and media manipulation these newspaper tycoons induced the United States to wage an unnecessary war against Spain. Sensational, inflammatory and propagandistic articles and editorials in Pulitzer's World and Hearst's Journal succeeded in inciting war hysteria and public enthusiasm for war with Spain.
Organising a War

Randolf Hearst famously sent artist Frederick Remington, and other Journal correspondents to report on the Civil War in Cuba. When Remington reported: Everything is quiet. There is no trouble here. There will be no war. I wish to return. Hearst sent the following famous telegram in reply: Please remain. You furnish the pictures and I'll furnish the war.
Inciting Conflict

Pulitzer and Hearst published inaccurate coverage, rumour, subterfuge, hearsay and outright fictitious reports to drum up a feverous public demand for war. On 15 February 1898, the US Battleship Maine blew up in Havanna harbour. The cause of this explosion was never determined, but the immediate US media reaction was to blame Spain. Pulitzer and Hearst clamoured for war with titles such as: Maine explosion caused by bomb or torpedo? Later Hearst's Journal ran the headline: How do you like the Journals' war?
The Father of Spin

After WWI, Edward Bernays pioneered Public Relations (PR) and became known as The Father of Spin. As the PR consulter for the American Tobacco Company, he campaigned to convince American women that they should smoke Lucky Strike cigarettes (the torches of freedom) to emancipate themselves!
Public Relations

Today American businesses spend trillions of dollars on marketing. PR firms employ over 150,000 workers.
Adolf Hitler on Propaganda

In Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler analysed Allied propaganda techniques used during the First World War:The art of propaganda led in understanding the emotional ideas of the masses and finding, through a psychologically correct form, the way to the attention, and then to the heart, of the masses. ...the purpose of propaganda is convince ...the masses ...its effect for the most part must be aimed at the emotions... The war propaganda of the English and the Americans was psychologically sound. By representing the Germans to their own people as Barbarians and Huns, they prepared the individual for the terrors of war... all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public understands what you want him to understand by your slogan... to be a leader means to be able to move the masses... the intelligence of the masses is small. Their forgetfulness is great. They must be told the same thing a thousand times.
Tactics of Propaganda

The tactics of propaganda have been analysed by numerous studies. Professor Johann Galtung listed some of the tactics used in propaganda, including:
1.          Decontextualizing violence: Focusing on the irrational without looking at the reasons...
2.          Dualism: Reducing the number of parties in a conflict to two, (when often more are involved.)
3.          Manichaeism: Portraying one side as good and demonising the other as evil.
4.          Armageddon: Presenting violence as inevitable, omitting alternatives.
5.          Confusion: Focusing only on the conflict arena, but not on the forces and factors that influence the violence.
6.          Never explaining why there are acts of revenge and spirals of violence.
7.          Failure to explore the causes of escalation and the impact of media coverage itself.
8.          Failure to explore the goals of outside interventionists, especially big powers and bankers.
9.          Failure to explore peace proposals and offer images of peaceful outcomes.
10.       Confusing cease fires and negotiations with actual peace and
11.       Omitting reconciliation as a viable option.
Distorting Perspectives

Propaganda does not need to be true, as long as it is plausible. Sometimes it can tell the truth, but withhold the point of view from the other side to create a distorted perspective.
Preparing a Nation for War

British journalist, Phillip Knightley, identified the four stages in preparing a nation for war:
1.          The Crisis: Negotiations are failing! We're on the brink of war! War is inevitable!
2.          The Demonization of the enemy leader.
3.          The Demonization of the enemy as individuals.
4.          Atrocities: Even making up stories to whip up and strengthen emotional reactions.
Betrayal of Trust

Knightley observed: The media demands that we trust it, but too often that trust has been betrayed.
Propaganda Strategies

Miren Gutierrez of Inter Press Service summarised propaganda strategies as follows:
Driving the agenda
Milking the story
Exploiting that we want to believe the best about ourselves
Perception management
Reinforcing existing attitudes and
Simple repetitious and emotional phrases.
Words are Weapons

Words are weapons in warfare. Propaganda involves word games. Name calling of the target nation by labelling people, groups and institutions in a negative manner.
Glittering Generalities

Glittering generality with regard to allies, labelling their people, groups and institutions in a positive manner.

Euphemisms are used to pacify the audience with bland meanings and connotations, such aspacification, technical incursion, etc. Civilian casualties are referred to as: collateral damage. Murder is replaced with: liquidation. Terror bombing of cities is called: saturation bombing or strategic bombing campaign. Starvation of civilian populations is called an economic blockade or sanctions.Looting of farms and murder of farmers is called: dekulakisation or land reform. Racial decriminalisation is called: Black Economic Empowerment and Affirmative Action. Sexual perversion is called Alternative Lifestyles.
False Connections

False connections are used to transfer symbols and imagery of positive institutions to strengthen the acceptance of the cause. Making use of testimonies from individuals not qualified to make the claims made (for example having sportsmen advise on how one should vote in a Referendum!).
Ordinary Appeals

Special appeals include: the everybody's doing it, join the bandwagon argument, through words designed to heighten or exploit fear and an appeal to ordinary citizens by leaders doing ordinary things that the viewer can identify with.
Thought Control

In 1921, American journalist Walter Lippmann said that the art of democracy requires themanufacture of consent. George Orwell described it as thought control. As democracies cannot control people by force, it controls them by influencing what they think, how they think and what they think about. Propaganda is to democracies what violence is to dictatorships.
Gullibility of the Public

Propaganda tends to work because people wish to believe the best about themselves and their country. It is often very hard to believe that our own leaders could possibly lie to us! From how the media portray them, they seem such likeable people!
Crowd Psychology

During the Nuremberg Trials, General Hermann Goring was reported to have said: It is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it be a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them that they are being attacked and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism, and exposing their country to danger. It works the same in any country.
Perception Management

John Rendon, the Founder of the Rendon Group, a PR Agency, told cadets at the US Air Force Academy: I am a politician... who uses communication to meet public policy... objectives. In fact I am an information warrior and a perception manager. Did you ever stop to wonder how the people of Kuwait City, after being held hostage for seven long and painful months, were able to get hand-held American flags? Well, you now know the answer. That was one of my jobs.
Manipulating Public Opinion

Another propaganda tactic is character assassination. Smear tactics are used to discredit, or destroy the reputation of someone perceived as an obstacle to the policy makers. The calculated manipulation of public opinion to serve political and ideological interests is achieved by appealing to the emotions to create reality which demands the action desired by the policy makers.
Holocaust in Rwanda

In Holocaust in Rwanda I documented the ease with which the orchestrators of the genocide in Rwanda confused international journalists and abused the national media to mobilise the unprecedented concentration of carnage. The massacres were meticulously organised in advance. The MRND government of Rwanda manipulated the international media by portraying the killings asspontaneous, tribal anarchy, uncontrolled tribal killing, tribalism, the result of the war.

A smokescreen of disinformation allowed the killers to proceed with their diabolical plans and kill over 800,000 people in a mere six weeks. They isolated their victims by imposing a news blackout, cutting telephone links, establishing a dense network of roadblocks and imposing a nationwide curfew. By cutting communications and restricting travel, they isolated their victims and sought to stifle the flow of news. They also timed the genocide to be launched on 6 April 1994, when most African correspondents were in South Africa for the Mandela elections. With most foreign news distracted by events in South Africa, the mass murderers in Rwanda were able to play the humanitarian card, pleading for emergency aid, all while they were engaged in genocide.
Mobilising Mass Murder
While deceiving the international news media, the MRND mobilised their national news media to denigrate all the targeted Tutsi tribe as foreignersHamitic invaders, cockroaches, racial supremistswho needed to be returned to Ethiopia by having their bodies thrown into the Nyabarongo River. Wild rumours were recklessly spread by Radio RTLM accusing the Tutsis of sinister plots. Popular poets and songwriters composed songs to provoke the majority Hutu tribe to hate their Tutsi neighbours. By totally dominating the mass media, the Hutu extremists were able to mould minds and fill them with hatred and a lust for blood. Hundreds-of-thousands of Hutu people were motivated to murder their neighbours. Hutu teachers murdered Tutsi students. Hutu doctors and nurses murdered Tutsi patients. Hutu priests and bishops murdered Tutsi congregants. The Holocaust in Rwanda was yet another proof that propaganda kills.
Dehumanise the Enemy

Many of the massacres of prisoners and atrocities committed against civilians in WWI and WWII, including the systematic saturation bombing of cities, would not have been possible without the demonization of the targeted enemy and their civilian population by propaganda. The farm invasions in Zimbabwe were preceded by state propaganda vilifying whites in general and farmers in particular. The Mau Mau murders in Kenya and the Simba massacres in the Congo were also motivated and mobilised by propaganda which dehumanised the targeted white farmers and missionaries. The incessant, anti-white propaganda in South Africa has led to over 3,000 brutal murders of white farmers in some of the most torturous ways possible. Songs such as 'Kill the Boer! Kill the farmer!' sung by prominent ANC leaders are like pouring petrol on a fire. The fact is that propaganda changes perceptions and people. Propaganda kills.
The Truth Sets Free

That is why it is absolutely essential that we know the truth of history to recognise the lies of propaganda. We need to study the truth in the Bible so that we can be freed from the deceptions of the world.
"You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free." John 8:32
Dr. Peter Hammond
The Reformation Society
P.O. Box 74 Newlands 7725
Cape Town South Africa
Tel: 021-689-4480
Fax: 021-685-5884
The audio CD of this lecture as presented to the Reformation Society is available from:
Christian Liberty Books
PO Box 358 Howard Place 7450
Cape Town South Africa.
Tel/Fax: 021-689-7478

Washington Post

10 reasons the U.S. is no longer the land of the free

Every year, the State Department issues reports on individual rights in other countries, monitoring the passage of restrictive laws and regulations around the world. Iran, for example, has been criticized for denying fair public trials and limiting privacy, while Russia has been taken to task for undermining due process. Other countries have been condemned for the use of secret evidence and torture.
Even as we pass judgment on countries we consider unfree, Americans remain confident that any definition of a free nation must include their own — the land of free. Yet, the laws and practices of the land should shake that confidence. In the decade since Sept. 11, 2001, this country has comprehensively reduced civil liberties in the name of an expanded security state. The most recent example of this was the National Defense Authorization Act, signed Dec. 31, which allows for the indefinite detention of citizens. At what point does the reduction of individual rights in our country change how we define ourselves?

While each new national security power Washington has embraced was controversial when enacted, they are often discussed in isolation. But they don’t operate in isolation. They form a mosaic of powers under which our country could be considered, at least in part, authoritarian. Americans often proclaim our nation as a symbol of freedom to the world while dismissing nations such as Cuba and China as categorically unfree. Yet, objectively, we may be only half right. Those countries do lack basic individual rights such as due process, placing them outside any reasonable definition of “free,” but the United States now has much more in common with such regimes than anyone may like to admit.

These countries also have constitutions that purport to guarantee freedoms and rights. But their governments have broad discretion in denying those rights and few real avenues for challenges by citizens — precisely the problem with the new laws in this country.
The list of powers acquired by the U.S. government since 9/11 puts us in rather troubling company.

Assassination of U.S. citizens

President Obama has claimed, as President George W. Bush did before him, the right to order the killing of any citizen considered a terrorist or an abettor of terrorism. Last year, he approved the killing of U.S. citizen Anwar al-Awlaqi and another citizen under this claimed inherent authority. Last month, administration officials affirmed that power, stating that the president can order the assassination of any citizen whom he considers allied with terrorists. (Nations such as Nigeria, Iran and Syria have been routinely criticized for extrajudicial killings of enemies of the state.)

Indefinite detention

Under the law signed last month, terrorism suspects are to be held by the military; the president also has the authority to indefinitely detain citizens accused of terrorism. While the administration claims that this provision only codified existing law, experts widely contest this view, and the administration has opposed efforts to challenge such authority in federal courts. The government continues to claim the right to strip citizens of legal protections based on its sole discretion. (China recently codified a more limited detention law for its citizens, while countries such as Cambodia have been singled out by the United States for “prolonged detention.”)

Arbitrary justice

The president now decides whether a person will receive a trial in the federal courts or in a military tribunal, a system that has been ridiculed around the world for lacking basic due process protections. Bush claimed this authority in 2001, and Obama has continued the practice. (Egypt and China have been denounced for maintaining separate military justice systems for selected defendants, including civilians.)

Warrantless searches

The president may now order warrantless surveillance, including a new capability to force companies and organizations to turn over information on citizens’ finances, communications and associations. Bush acquired this sweeping power under the Patriot Act in 2001, and in 2011, Obama extended the power, including searches of everything from business documents to library records. The government can use “national security letters” to demand, without probable cause, that organizations turn over information on citizens — and order them not to reveal the disclosure to the affected party. (Saudi Arabia and Pakistan operate under laws that allow the government to engage in widespread discretionary surveillance.)

Secret evidence

The government now routinely uses secret evidence to detain individuals and employs secret evidence in federal and military courts. It also forces the dismissal of cases against the United States by simply filing declarations that the cases would make the government reveal classified information that would harm national security — a claim made in a variety of privacy lawsuits and largely accepted by federal judges without question. Even legal opinions, cited as the basis for the government’s actions under the Bush and Obama administrations, have been classified. This allows the government to claim secret legal arguments to support secret proceedings using secret evidence. In addition, some cases never make it to court at all. The federal courts routinely deny constitutional challenges to policies and programs under a narrow definition of standing to bring a case.

War crimes

The world clamored for prosecutions of those responsible for waterboarding terrorism suspects during the Bush administration, but the Obama administration said in 2009 that it would not allow CIA employees to be investigated or prosecuted for such actions. This gutted not just treaty obligations but the Nuremberg principles of international law. When courts in countries such as Spain moved to investigate Bush officials for war crimes, the Obama administration reportedly urged foreign officials not to allow such cases to proceed, despite the fact that the United States has long claimed the same authority with regard to alleged war criminals in other countries. (Various nations have resisted investigations of officials accused of war crimes and torture. Some, such as Serbia and Chile, eventually relented to comply with international law; countries that have denied independent investigations include Iran, Syria and China.)

Secret court

The government has increased its use of the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which has expanded its secret warrants to include individuals deemed to be aiding or abetting hostile foreign governments or organizations. In 2011, Obama renewed these powers, including allowing secret searches of individuals who are not part of an identifiable terrorist group. The administration has asserted the right to ignore congressional limits on such surveillance. (Pakistan places national security surveillance under the unchecked powers of the military or intelligence services.)

 Immunity from judicial review

Like the Bush administration, the Obama administration has successfully pushed for immunity for companies that assist in warrantless surveillance of citizens, blocking the ability of citizens to challenge the violation of privacy. (Similarly, China has maintained sweeping immunity claims both inside and outside the country and routinely blocks lawsuits against private companies.)
 Continual monitoring of citizens

The Obama administration has successfully defended its claim that it can use GPS devices to monitor every move of targeted citizens without securing any court order or review. (Saudi Arabia has installed massive public surveillance systems, while Cuba is notorious for active monitoring of selected citizens.)
Extraordinary renditions

The government now has the ability to transfer both citizens and noncitizens to another country under a system known as extraordinary rendition, which has been denounced as using other countries, such as Syria, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Pakistan, to torture suspects. The Obama administration says it is not continuing the abuses of this practice under Bush, but it insists on the unfettered right to order such transfers — including the possible transfer of U.S. citizens.
Final Comments: Land of the Free?

These new laws have come with an infusion of money into an expanded security system on the state and federal levels, including more public surveillance cameras, tens of thousands of security personnel and a massive expansion of a terrorist-chasing bureaucracy.
Some politicians shrug and say these increased powers are merely a response to the times we live in. Thus, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) could declare in an interview last spring without objection that “free speech is a great idea, but we’re in a war.” Of course, terrorism will never “surrender” and end this particular “war.”
Other politicians rationalize that, while such powers may exist, it really comes down to how they are used. This is a common response by liberals who cannot bring themselves to denounce Obama as they did Bush. Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), for instance, has insisted that Congress is not making any decision on indefinite detention: “That is a decision which we leave where it belongs — in the executive branch.”
And in a signing statement with the defense authorization bill, Obama said he does not intend to use the latest power to indefinitely imprison citizens. Yet, he still accepted the power as a sort of regretful autocrat.
An authoritarian nation is defined not just by the use of authoritarian powers, but by the ability to use them. If a president can take away your freedom or your life on his own authority, all rights become little more than a discretionary grant subject to executive will.
The framers lived under autocratic rule and understood this danger better than we do. James Madison famously warned that we needed a system that did not depend on the good intentions or motivations of our rulers: “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.”
Benjamin Franklin was more direct. In 1787, a Mrs. Powel confronted Franklin after the signing of the Constitution and asked, “Well, Doctor, what have we got — a republic or a monarchy?” His response was a bit chilling: “A republic, Madam, if you can keep it.”
Since 9/11, we have created the very government the framers feared: a government with sweeping and largely unchecked powers resting on the hope that they will be used wisely.
The indefinite-detention provision in the defense authorization bill seemed to many civil libertarians like a betrayal by Obama. While the president had promised to veto the law over that provision, Levin, a sponsor of the bill, disclosed on the Senate floor that it was in fact the White House that approved the removal of any exception for citizens from indefinite detention.
Dishonesty from politicians is nothing new for Americans. The real question is whether we are lying to ourselves when we call this country the land of the free.

Jonathan Turley
is the Shapiro professor of public interest law at George Washington University.
2012: Evidence Suggests Defeat for the New World Order

Forever Food in the Garden
Next World TV

Bill Mollison's Garden

Bill Mollison from Tasmania, Australia, is a researcher, author, scientist, teacher and naturalist. He is considered to be the 'father of permaculture'.

He takes us on a tour of his garden here and explains that permaculture is a way to develop a system that can go on forever. "Your work in planting is done after a year or so, and basically after that you become a forager."

Doesn't that sound great? He says: "Nature doesn't contain such a garden. It's incredibly rich in functional plants and in yields- higher than a monoculture system or nature itself."

"There is always something to eat, any time of year" he says, hand picking his next salad. Of course he is in a tropical climate- but growing food with these principles, on any scale, in any climate is well worth learning more about.

--Bibi Farber
Awakening The Genius Within
(Video Tutorial)
Green Med Info

Let's face it: the only real justification for using vaccines to "immunize" ourselves against disease is derived from the natural fact that when challenged by infectious agents the humoral arm of our immune system launches a successful response capable of conferring lasting immunity. Were it not for the elegance, proficiency, and mostly asymptomatic success of our recombinatorial immune system in dealing so well with infectious challenges, vaccination would have no cause, no scientific explanation, no justification whatsoever.

In fact, ever since the adaptive, antigen-specific immune system evolved in early vertebrates 500 million years ago, our bodies have been doing a pretty good job of keeping us alive on this planet without need for synthetic, vaccine-mediated immunity. Indeed,  infectious challenges are necessary for the development of a healthy immune system and in order to prevent autoimmune conditions from emerging as a result of TH2 dominance. In other words, take away these natural infectious challenges, and the immune system can and will turn upon itself; take way these infectious challenges and lasting immunity against tens, if not hundreds of thousands of pathogens we are exposed to throughout our lives, would not be possible.

Can vaccines really co-opt, improve upon, and replace natural immunity with synthetic immunity?

How many will this require?

Are we not already at the critical threshold of vaccine overload?

By "improving" on our humanness in this way, are we not also at the same moment departing dramatically from it?