Friday, May 4, 2012

Maypole Misfits

Callers: Mike In Kentucky, John In Tennessee


Earth Witchery
The Maypole
May Day Chants
We are the flow and we are the ebb
We are the weavers, we are the web
We are the needle, we are the thread
We are the witches, back from the dead
Weavers, weavers,
We are weaving the web of life.
Weave, weave, weave me a rainbow
Out of the falling rain.
Weave me the hope of a new tomorrow.
Fill my cup again
Lady, weave Your circle tight
With a web of living light
Earth and Air and Fire and Water
Bind us to you.
cinco de Mayo
May 5
Cinco de Mayo or the Fifth of May is a national holiday in Mexico commemorating the Battle of Puebla on May 5, 1862, in which Mexican troops under General Ignacio Zaragoza defeated the invading French forces of Napoleon III. Although the battle itself represented only a temporary setback for the French, the Mexicans' victory against overwhelming odds gave them the confidence they needed to persevere until finally triumphing on April 2, 1867.
The anniversary of this event is celebrated not only in Mexico but in many American communities with large Mexican-American populations—especially in the southwestern states of Texas, Arizona, and southern California. The events include parades, patriotic speeches, bullfights, barbecues, and beauty contests. Olvera Street in Los Angeles is particularly known for its Cinco de Mayo celebration.
Contrary to widespread popular belief, Cinco de Mayo is not Mexico's Independence Day—the most important national patriotic holiday in Mexico—which is actually celebrated on September 16.
Cinco de Mayo (Spanish for "fifth of May") is a celebration held on May 5. It is celebrated nationwide in the United States and regionally in Mexico, primarily in the state of Puebla, where the holiday is called El Dia de la Batalla de Puebla (English: The Day of the Battle of Puebla). The date is observed in the United States as a celebration of Mexican heritage and pride, and to commemorate the cause of freedom and democracy during the first years of the American Civil War. In the state of Puebla, the date is observed to commemorate the Mexican army's unlikely victory over French forces at the Battle of Puebla on May 5, 1862, under the leadership of General Ignacio Zaragoza Seguín. Contrary to widespread popular belief, Cinco de Mayo is not Mexico's Independence Day—the most important national patriotic holiday in Mexico—which is actually celebrated on September 16.
Events leading to Cinco de Mayo
Cinco de Mayo has its roots in the French occupation of Mexico, which took place in the aftermath of the Mexican-American War of 1846-48, the Mexican Civil War of 1858, and the 1860 Reform Wars. These wars left the Mexican Treasury in ruins and nearly bankrupt. On July 17, 1861, Mexican President Benito Juárez issued a moratorium in which all foreign debt payments would be suspended for two years. In response, France, Britain, and Spain sent naval forces to Veracruz to demand reimbursement. Britain and Spain negotiated with Mexico and withdrew, but France, at the time ruled by Napoleon III, decided to use the opportunity to establish a Latin empire in Mexico that would favor French interests, the Second Mexican Empire.
The French invasion
Late in 1861, a well-armed French fleet stormed Veracruz, landing a large French force and driving President Juárez and his government into retreat. Moving on from Veracruz towards Mexico City, the French army encountered heavy resistance from the Mexicans near Puebla, at the Mexican forts of Loreto and Guadalupe. The 8,000-strong French army attacked the much more poorly equipped Mexican army of 4,000. Yet, on May 5, 1862, the Mexicans managed to decisively crush the French army, one which, according to an article in Philadelphia's The Bulletin daily newspaper, was the best army of the time.
The Mexican victory
The victory represented a significant morale boost to the Mexican army and the Mexican people at large. In the description of The History Channel, "Although not a major strategic win in the overall war against the French, Zaragoza's success at Puebla represented a great symbolic victory for the Mexican government and bolstered the resistance movement."[18] The description of Time magazine was: "The Puebla victory came to symbolize unity and pride for what seemed like a Mexican David defeating a French Goliath."[19] It helped establish a much-needed sense of national unity and patriotism.
Events after the Battle
The Mexican victory, however, was short-lived. Thirty thousand troops and a full year later, the French were able to depose the Mexican army, capture Mexico City, and establish Emperor Maximilian I as ruler of Mexico. However, the French victory was also short-lived, lasting only 3 years, from 1864 to 1867. With the U.S. Civil War over in 1865, the U.S. was able to provide more assistance to Mexico to expel the French, after which Maximilian I was executed by the Mexicans, along with his Mexican generals Miramón and Mejía, in the Cerro de las Campanas, Queretaro.
The Battle of Puebla was important for at least two reasons. First, although considerably outnumbered, the Mexicans defeated a much better-equipped French army. "This battle was significant in that the 4,000 Mexican soldiers were greatly outnumbered by the well-equipped French army of 8,000 that had not been defeated for almost 50 years."  Second, it was significant because since the Battle of Puebla, no country in the Americas has been invaded by any other European military force.
Consequences to the United States
Some historians have argued that France's real goal was to help break up the American Union, at the time in the midst of a civil war, by helping the southern Confederacy: "The Mexicans had won a great victory that kept Napoleon III from supplying the confederate rebels for another year, allowing the United States to build a powerful army. This grand army smashed the Confederates at Gettysburg just 14 months after the battle of Puebla, essentially ending the Civil War." The consequence of Cinco de Mayo to the United States has been thus recognized: "The defeat of the French army had consequences for America as well...the French defeat denied Napoleon III the opportunity to resupply the Confederate rebels for another year."
Donald W. Miles adds, "At the time, there were fears in the United States that the French would use Mexico as a base to back the Confederacy, so President Lincoln and his Secretary of State went out of their way to appear 'neutral' in the Mexican situation. They did not want to take on the French and the Confederates at the same time". Dr. Miles goes on to explain that "Napoleon III had hesitated to take on the United States directly, but now the news of the Civil War changed everything". It meant that the Americans would be occupied with their conflict between North and South for some time. Upon hearing the Spaniards and the British had sailed off to grab the customs house in Veracruz to start collecting their duties, Napoleon decided he would not only send the French navy, but would also start looking for someone to place as emperor in Mexico. He would then use Mexico as a base to help the Confederates win their war against the United States. Napoleon saw this as an opportunity not to be missed. Dr. Miles then concludes, "The Emperor of France ordered his generals to spend a few months taking on Mexico and then - using Mexico as a 'base' - help the Confederates win their war against the United States. What if they had succeeded? The United States would never become the significant world power it is today...the Mexicans not only took their nation back, but influenced the outcome of the U.S. Civil War."
Historian Justo Sierra has written in his Political Evolution of the Mexican People, that had Mexico not defeated the French in Puebla on May 5, 1862, France would have gone to the aid of the South in the U.S. Civil War and the United States' destiny could have been very different.

"If nationality is consent, the state is compulsion." - Henri Frederic Amiel
"In the twentieth century one of the most personal relationships to have developed is that of the person and the state. It's become a fact of life that governments have become very intimate with people, most always to their detriment." - E. L. Doctorow
"The State has but one face for me: that of the police. To my eyes, all of the State's ministries have this single face, and I cannot imagine the ministry of culture other than as the police of culture, with its prefect and commissioners." - Jean Dubuffet
"While the State becomes inflated and hypertrophied in order to obtain a firm enough grip upon individuals, but without succeeding, the latter, without mutual relationships, tumble over one another like so many liquid molecules, encountering no central energy to retain, fix and organize them." - Emile Durkheim
"The State must follow, and not lead, the character and progress of the citizen." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
"The State is the altar of political freedom and, like the religious altar, it is maintained for the purpose of human sacrifice." - Emma Goldman
Dhimmitude is a neologism first found in French denoting an attitude of concession, surrender and appeasement towards Islamic demands. It is derived by adding the productive suffix -tude to the Arabic language adjective dhimmi, which literally means protected and refers to a non-Muslim subject of a sharia law state.
Dhimmitude has several distinct, but related meanings depending on the author; its scope may be historical only, contemporary only, or both. It may encompass the whole system of dhimma, look only at its subjects (dhimmis), or even apply it outside of any established system of dhimma.
The term was coined in 1982 by the Lebanese President and Maronite militia leader Bachir Gemayel, in reference to perceived attempts by the country's Muslim leadership to subordinate the large Lebanese Christian minority. In a speech of September 14, 1982 given at Dayr al-Salib in Lebanon, he said: "Lebanon is our homeland and will remain a homeland for Christians… We want to continue to christen, to celebrate our rites and traditions, our faith and our creed whenever we wish… Henceforth, we refuse to live in any dhimmitude!"
The concept of "dhimmitude" was introduced into Western discourse by the writer Bat Ye'or in a French-language article published in the Italian journal La Rassegna mensile di Israel in 1983. The term was used in English as early as 1985 in a book review by Prof. James E. Biechler in the Journal of Ecumenical Studies, in which he praised Ye'or's work, commenting that "Perhaps the single most significant contribution of the author is her definition and development of the concept of 'dhimmitude'".
Ye'or further popularised the term in her books The Decline of Eastern Christianity under Islam. From Jihad to Dhimmitude. Seventh-Twentieth Century and the 2003 follow-up Islam and Dhimmitude: Where Civilizations Collide. After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the term became far more widely used, particularly in discussions about Islamism and the Islamization of the West.
Ochlocracy (Greek: οχλοκρατία or okhlokratía; Latin: ochlocratia) or mob rule is government by mob or a mass of people, or the intimidation of legitimate authorities. As a pejorative for majoritarianism, it is akin to the Latin phrase mobile vulgus meaning "the fickle crowd", from which the English term "mob" was originally derived in the 1680s.
Ochlocracy ("rule of the general populace") is democracy ("rule of the people") spoiled by demagoguery, "tyranny of the majority" and the rule of passion over reason, just like oligocracy ("rule of a few") is aristocracy ("rule of the best") spoiled by corruption. Ochlocracy is synonymous in meaning and usage to the modern, informal term "Mobocracy," which emerged from a much more recent colloquial etymology.
The term appears to have been coined by Polybius in his Histories (6.4.6). [2] He uses it to name the 'pathological' version of popular rule in opposition to the good version, which he refers to as democracy. There are numerous mentions of the word "ochlos" in the Talmud (where "ochlos" refers to anything from "mob," "populace" to "armed guard"), as well as in Rashi, a Jewish commentary on the Bible. The word is recorded in English since 1584, derived from the French ochlocratie (1568), which stems from the original Greek okhlokratia, from okhlos "mob" and kratos "rule, power, strength"
In ancient Greek political thought ochlocracy was considered as one of the three "bad" forms of government (tyranny, oligarchy and ochlocracy) as opposed to the three "good" forms of government (monarchy, aristocracy and democracy). The distinction between "good" and "bad" was made according to whether the government form would act in the interest of the whole community ("good") or the exclusive interests of a group or individual at the expense of the justice ("bad").
An ochlocrat is one who is an advocate or partisan of ochlocracy. It can also be used as an adjective (ochlocratic or ochlocratical).
The threat of "mob rule" to a democracy is restrained by ensuring that the rule of law protects minorities or individuals against short-term demagoguery or moral panic. Though considering how laws in a democracy are established or repealed by the majority, the rule of law's protection of minorities is questionable.
Mobs in history
Historians often comment on mob rule as a factor in the rise of Rome and its maintenance, as the city of Rome itself was large—between 100,000 and 250,000 citizens—while the aristocracy and even military was very small by comparison to the citizenry. Lapses in this control often led to loss of power, or even the loss of heads, of officials—most notably in the reign of Commodus when Cleander unwisely used the Praetorian Guard against a mob which had come to call for his head. As Edward Gibbon relates it,
The people... demanded with angry clamors the head of the public enemy. Cleander, who commanded the Praetorian Guards, ordered a body of cavalry to sally forth and disperse the seditious multitude. The multitude fled with precipitation towards the city; several were slain, and many more were trampled to death; but when the cavalry entered the streets their pursuit was checked by a shower of stones and darts from the roofs and windows of the houses. The foot guards, who had long been jealous of the prerogatives and insolence of the Praetorian cavalry, embraced the party of the people. The tumult became a regular engagement and threatened a general massacre. The Praetorians at length gave way, oppressed with numbers; and the tide of popular fury returned with redoubled violence against the gates of the palace, where Commodus lay dissolved in luxury and alone unconscious of the civil war... Commodus started from his dream of pleasure and commanded that the head of Cleander should be thrown out to the people. The desired spectacle instantly appeased the tumult...
This followed a previous incident in which the legions of Britain had demanded and received the death of Perennis, the prior administrator. The mob thus realized that it had every chance of success.
The Salem Witch Trials, in which the unified belief of the townspeople overpowered the logic of the law, has also been cited as an example of mob rule. In 1837, Abraham Lincoln wrote about lynching and "the increasing disregard for law which pervades the country--the growing disposition to substitute the wild and furious passions in lieu of the sober judgment of courts, and the worse than savage mobs for the executive ministers of justice."
Mobs used to affect policy
The modern theories of civil disobedience and satyagraha can be differentiated from "mob rule" and its mechanics, as these approaches forego the use of violence and force that the mob of ancient times employed.
Traditional non-violent protest theory holds that if the demonstrators are restrained and do not do any violence, yet refuse to back down, then they could conceivably win, as they either will be joined by the forces they face, be allowed to defy the law or government openly and peacefully, or be physically attacked, struck down, and made into powerful moral symbols of the lengths to which the agents of the state will go to enforce its laws. However, police forces around the world have become adept at making such gatherings irrelevant by limiting them to areas, in some cases dubbed "free speech zones," sufficiently separate from the object of their discontent, the rest of the public, and the media, to make them easily ignored. Permitting requirements in many jurisdictions effectively make demonstrations without advance police permission illegal. Various efforts to increase demonstrators’ communal intelligence and mobility using cell phone networks and bicycles have been employed to circumvent crowd control and marginalizing techniques with speed. Flash mobs and Critical Mass style "bike block" actions are examples experimented with, with mixed results, notably during the 2004 Republican National Convention.
Modern theory concludes that since Roman guards, facing crucifixion for disobedience, could be swayed by mobs, it is also possible to sway modern police, even in a police state. The 1986 EDSA Revolution in the Philippines, the Velvet Revolution in former Czechoslovakia, and the resistance to the attempted military coup in the Soviet Union in 1991 that led to the dissolution of that state, are situations where it is possible that it was the "mob" which won the day due to defections by authority. The use of political pressure put on by a large amassed group of people was also frequently demonstrated in the Arab Spring, which contributed to swift political change in countries as Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya.
See also
 Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: Ochlocracy
Appeal to the majority
Bandwagon effect
 Collective consciousness
            Collective effervescence
 Collective hysteria
 Collective intelligence
  Crowd manipulation
  Crowd psychology
 Group (sociology)
 Group behavior
 Herd behavior
 Peer pressure
  Reno Gang
 Smart mob
 Social comparison theory
 Spiral of silence
 Tribalism Vigilantism 

^ "Mob". Retrieved 2008-11-01.  ^ "Polybius, Histories, The Rotation of Polities". Retrieved 2008-03-29.  ^ Mob Rule and Violence in American Culture ^ Opposition to Mob-Rule. The Writings of Abraham Lincoln, Volume 1 ^ [1] From Dictatorship to Democracy by Gene Sharp ^ [2] From Dictatorship to Democracy by Gene Sharp Bibliography
Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn (under pseudonym Francis Stuart Campbell), The Menace of the Herd, The Bruce Publishing Company, Milwaukee, 1943. (Note where the term "ochlocracy" is used throughout the book.) Chana Shaffer, outline of presentation on ochlacracies for political science society in Touro College. Available on the Touro website
Etymology Online
new criticism

Moses Hess
(1812-1875) Socialist writer and forerunner of Zionism. Hess was born in Bonn and received an Orthodox upbringing, but was soon drawn to philosophy and particularly philosophical socialism, collaborating with Marx and Engels. He lived intermittently in Paris from the early 1840s until his death. Unlike Marx and Engels, he saw the racial struggle as taking precedence over the class struggle, soon breaking with the "scientific socialists" and even being reviled by them. In 1862 he published the Zionist classic Rome and Jerusalem: The Last National Question, declaring that "after twenty years of estrangement, I have returned to my people." In it he argued for the revival of Jewish nationalism and the reconstitution of the nation in its ancient homeland, where the unique ethical and religious genius of the race could flourish. He envisaged a society founded on socialist principles in a ramified network of agricultural settlements and cooperative communities. His book was largely forgotten until the emergence of the Zionist movement at the turn of the century, inspiring Herzl to declare: "What a noble, exalted spirit. Everything we have tried is already in this book."
Hess was active as a writer to the end of his life. His remains were reinterred in Israel in 1961, beside the Sea of Galilee.
He was responsible for converting Engels to Communism, and he early introduced Marx to social and economic problems. Hess played a prominent role in transforming Hegelian theory by conceiving of man as the initiator of history rather than as a mere observer. He was reluctant to base all human destiny on economic causes and class struggle, and he came to see the struggle of races, or nationalities, as the prime factor of past history. In Rom und Jerusalem (1862, tr. 1958) he declared that the freeing and uniting of humanity was the mission of the Jewish people and urged the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine.

Rome and Jerusalem

The Last National Question 

By Moses Hess

  Book published in 1862 in Leipzig. It gave impetus to the Labor Zionism movement. In his magnum opus, Hess argued for the Jews to return to the Land of Israel, and proposed a socialist country in which the Jews would become agrarianised through a process of "redemption of the soil".


Dr. Ben Kim
The Best Approach to Treating Any Health Condition
Natural News
Vaccines have been based on medical fraud for over a hundred years
(NaturalNews) The concept of vaccinating to immunize began in 1796, when British apothecary (pharmacist) Edward Jenner inserted cowpox pus under the skin of an eight year old boy. Jenner based his experiment on an unsubstantiated rumor that anyone who had experienced cowpox would be immune to smallpox.
Over the next couple of years, Jenner vaccinated others with cowpox to immunize them against smallpox. Without any actual proof of efficacy and safety, Jenner impressed King George III enough with a bogus immunization guarantee that he was awarded the equivalent of today's $500,000.
Thus, Jenner was the first medical professional to administer diseased matter as medication to a healthy person and receive a substantial financial award. He was also the first to constantly denounce vaccination detractors successfully. He was protecting both his ego and large public purse.
Many health professionals throughout the 19th Century knew that there had been several cases of smallpox among those with cowpox histories. Jenner's premise was flawed.
This was actually the beginning of a tradition that is carried on by today's vaccinators. Come up with a bogus solution to prevent a disease, make a bundle of cash, and shut down reasonable arguments from those who know immunization by vaccination doesn't work safely or effectively.
England's incidents of smallpox after vaccination rose steadily from five percent in the beginning to 95% by 1895. There was even a serious epidemic around 1872, one year after smallpox vaccinations were decreed mandatory in the UK. The mortality rate among smallpox victims also shot up five-fold around that time.
Despite intelligent protests with obvious facts and figures disproving efficacy, and proving harm from toxic materials and viruses contained in vaccines that endanger natural immunity, the inoculation for immunization premise has been maintained.
Protecting the industry against truth by attacking reasonable dissenters viciously has resulted in vaccine industry revenue of $17 billion annually today. This doesn't include revenue from doctors' visits for vaccinations and resulting ill health from them.
The vaccinators' tactics of suppressing scientific data from concerned professionals has become more mafia like. Sincere medical professionals who register health concerns over vaccines are severely punished and slandered by the medical mafia owned mainstream media.
Friendly Aquaponics
Aquaponics Newsletters
how the city of london controls the ex-colonies

(An extract from a book by Jack Lang on the Great Depression in Australia. Lang was Labor Premier of New South Wales from 1925-27 and from 1930-32. Thanks to Peter Myers. – RB)

It was the City of London that had established what was known as the mercantile System out of the industrial revolution. The Victorian era had been one of great commercial expansion. With that rare genius for political invention, Gladstone, Disraeli and other British statesmen sought a substitute for the old system of Crown Colonies. They found it in the British Empire. Their formula was to hand to the colonies the right to govern themselves, providing they did not break the financial nexus with the City of London. The City of London provided all the capital required for the development of the colonies. The City controlled the ships, the wool and wheat exchanges, the insurance houses and all the other machinery of trade and commerce. Self-government for the colonies did not mean financial independence. Just as the Medici Family had been the money-lenders of the Middle Ages, so that their family emblem of the three golden balls became the signpost of the pawn shop, so did the frock-coated gentlemen, who worked in the City, become the money-lenders of the Empire. It was still the day of the country manors, the ducal estates, the hunt clubs and the stately London hide-outs of the aristocracy. They clipped their coupons each quarter and cashed them for their interest on loans raised for “poor colonies.” They collected dividend cheques from companies operating in places they couldn’t even locate on the map.
The Old Lady of Threadneedle Street, as they called the Bank of Engand, presided over the financial dynasty of the Empire. It was supported by the Big Five, the major private banks. If a government in the Dominions or the colonies wanted to raise money, it had to go through approved channels. The financial world was divided into zones of influence. The Houses of Nivison, Rothschild, Barings and Morgan, Grenfell, all had their respective rights. If a government in the colonies wanted to raise money, it could only approach one firm. It had to meet a rigidly controlled scale of underwriting fees. It had to accept the conditions and the interest rates dictated by its London representatives. Every Government had its London agents, who were actually agents for the British investors. There was no room for argument. It was a case of taking it or leaving it. It was useless to try another source. The City had its own underground communication system. It was left to the underwriters to divide up the spoil. They simply produced the clearing house.
Adask’s Law
George Orwell on the Purpose of Governmental Power
Veterans Today / Tom Valentine
Justice? Law and Order? My Ass!
More History you don’t know
February 2010
This publication is available at
Army Knowledge Online and
General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine
Digital Library at
Obama Signs Executive Order Declaring International Law For The United States
On May 1, 2012, our Glorious Leader, Premier Barack Obama AKA Barry Soetoro AKA Barry the Rat, signed yet another Executive Order – Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation. This dictate is designed to standardize regulations between the United States and it’s so called trading partners.
What is a regulation? A law. So what is actually being attempted here is a standardization of international law. It is an absolute violation of the Constitution for the United States to legislate our law outside of our borders.
Considering the many international security agreements the traitors occupying our highest seats of power have entered into, this latest executive order can absolutely be used to institute gun confiscation laws/regulations, without any consent by our Congress or our Judicial. And once these foreign laws are brought to the United States under the various security agreements, foreign troops will be brought in to enforce the foreign laws upon the people of the United States.
the Hipcrime Vocab
What If A Collapse Happened And Nobody Noticed?
the Hipcrime Vocab
Texas Goes Marxist
“Curious…” --Lark
Daisy Luther / Canadian Preppers Network
The Regime's Guide to Good Citizenship
Daisy Luther / Canadian Preppers Network
Codex Alimentarius:
An Introduction to Soft Kill Eugenics

The world as we once knew it is gone.  The rosy cheeked children, bursting with energy, that once climbed trees and got up to mischief, are extinct.  The people are still here, but they are pale, lethargic and slowly dying.
Every bite of food provided to these people is the product of a laboratory – the genetically modified spawn of Big Agri and Big Pharma.  The food looks incredible – huge, radiant tomatoes such a vivid red that one would think the lycopene was virtually emanating from the skin of the fruit.  Inside that appealing package is a food-like substance, utterly raped of nutrients.
The people are unable to go to a health-food store and purchase vitamins or an herbal tonic to put the spring back in their step.  Herbs, vitamins and nutrients in general have been labeled “toxins” and are only available via prescription at high prices and low doses.
If the people are caught hoarding treasured fertile heirloom seeds, and heaven forbid, planting them to grow their own food, punishment is swift and sure.  The bounty is taken and the people starve again.
Amidst the abundance of burgeoning supermarket shelves, the majority of the world’s population is slowly starving to death.
Activist Post
Royal Society Believes Depopulation Will Save the Environment
The global Elite have many different clubs they frequent where they discuss plans to achieve their plan for global governance. One of these is the Royal Society, a 350-year-old establishment comprised of global Elitists who are promoting the hoax of man-made climate change which masks their depopulation agenda. They are also integral in coercing elected officials into supporting global carbon taxing that will funnel exorbitant amounts of money into the hands of the Elite to fund their march toward global governance.
They have published a report on their website entitled People and the Planet.
According to the Royal Society, “the world’s human population, coupled with unprecedented levels of consumption present profound challenges to human health and well-being, and the natural environment.”
This group of Eco-fascists believes that securitizing the resources of third world countries, combined with reducing their consumption globally will stabilize the planet’s failing environment.
Sir John Sulson of the Human Genome Project suggests that “this is a topic that has gone to and fro in the last few decades, and appears to be moving back up the political agenda now. So it seems a good moment for the Royal Society to launch a study that looks objectively at the scientific basis for changes in population, for the different regional and cultural factors that may affect that, and at the effects that population changes will have on our future in term of sustainable development.”
The promise of B-corps
The Toulouse killings and the radical right - part I
Marine Le Pen, the radical right and French Islamophobia - Part II
Fanatic For
Joel Osteen: Mormonism is Christian
Fanatic For
Where to Draw the Line with Occult Information
Global / Michel Chossudovsky
Fanatic For
Pres. Obama’s New Campaign Slogan: Forward
The Obama campaign released its new campaign slogan in a 7-minute video. The title leader of the video is simply the word "Forward" with the "O" having the familiar Obama logo from 2008. The image can only be seen for a second, so you may miss it.

"The name Forward carries a special meaning in socialist political terminology. It has been frequently used as a name for socialist, communist and other left-wing newspapers and publications," says the Washington Times.

Mao's Great Leap Forward campaign

Forward for the Motherland - for our victory

Forward to Communism? Doubt it not!

Revisionist History

The Prop-Masters

Perpetrators of the holocaust against Christian Russia transform themselves into "survivors" of "the Holocaust"

The portraits above are of the same man but in two different incarnations. On the left we see Martin "Gray" in retirement after a successful career peddling fake antiques to gullible collectors. He is holding his mass market paperback, For Those I Loved, which is filled with his exploits as a saintly "Holocaust Survivor" who was supposedly forced to help clear bodies out of the Treblinka "gas chamber." The earlier portrait on the right is of the youthful Gray as a decorated officer in the Soviet NKVD (the forerunner of the KGB), responsible for the murder of millions of Christians and gentiles in Russia and Eastern Europe. Even Establishment researchers have had to admit that Gray's book is as phony as the antiques he peddled. But Gray's scam is symbolic of countless other Communist ghouls who have managed to land on their feet in the West, disguised as poor, persecuted "Survivors of the Holocaust" and feted as the saints and martyrs of the universe. Meanwhile the holocaust they perpetrated against millions of Christians slips further down the dark environs of Orwell's memory hole.

In chapter 13 of Charles Dickens' Oliver Twist, Dickens notes that Fagin has an inexhaustible supply of props and disguises.

Judaic Communists: The Documentary Record

by Michael A. Hoffman II

Copyright 2006. All Rights Reserved

"The only two non-Jews in the communist conspiracy were Chambers and Hiss...Every other one was a Jew and it raised hell with us."

Statement of President Richard Nixon in 1971, as recorded at the White House on tape and released by the National Archives in 1999. The reference is to Whittaker Chambers and Alger Hiss. (Sources: N.Y. Times, Oct. 7, 1999 and Newsweek, Oct. 18, 1999, p. 30)

"It is legitimate to adopt a critical attitude toward the relatively large number of Jews who particularly in the first decade after the Bolshevik revolution collaborated with the Soviet Government in the persecution of other peoples."

Statement of researcher Michael Mills, an official of the government of Australia at Canberra. (Source: Forward, March 10, 2000)

Judaic Professor Arno Mayer of Princeton in his important book, Why Did the Heavens Not Darken? states that the German invasion of Russia was carried out with the intention to eradicate Bolshevik (Soviet Communist) ideology. The Germans were hardly the only ones in the West to believe that, "Soviet Russia is a dictatorship of Jewry."

On Feb. 8, 1920 a young British writer made a similar observation in the Illustrated Sunday Herald:

"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews."

The writer was Winston Churchill. Though he would later sell his soul for considerably more than thirty pieces of silver, his analysis of the authentic nature of Soviet communism remains trenchant.

Churchill expressed the crucial insight that the crimes perpetrated by Jewish communists against Germans and Russians instilled in those people a desire for retribution:

"In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed, the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.

"The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people.

"...The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with villainies which are now being perpetrated...Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people." (End quote from Churchill).

"...a letter sent to the Vatican by Pius XII in 1919, when he was Bishop Eugenio Pacelli and papal nuncio in Munich...reports on his deputy's unpleasant encounter with Bolshevik revolutionaries who were then terrorizing Catholic priests and the German bourgeoisie. The letter describes the leader, Max Lieven as a '... Russian and a Jew.' The letter also describes Mr. Lieven's companions, '...Jews like the rest of them.'...Bishop Pacelli's description of Jewish Communists...was hardly uncommon 80 years ago." (N.Y. Times, Nov. 3, 1999).

Chaim Bermant, writing in the Jewish Chronicle (Aug. 30, 1991), says: "It was Communism which toppled the hated Czars, Communism which removed Jewish disabilities and proscribed anti-Semitism and Communism which, in its early days at least, opened the doors to Jewish advancement."

Lenin, whose maternal grandfather, Israel Blank, was Judaic, said that Judaics made the best revolutionaries: "The clever Russian is almost always a Jew or has Jewish blood in him." (Dmitri Volkogonov, Lenin: A New Biography, p. 112). Lenin was both clever and a revolutionary. He was surely referring to himself.

Researcher Wayne McGuire of Harvard University writes: "Lenin was a Jew by the standards of Israel's Law of Return: he possessed a Jewish grandparent. It would seem that not only was Lenin a Jew, but that he was a Jewish racist and chauvinist, although he kept his ideas on this volatile subject far in the background, probably because they were in radical conflict with the supposed universalism of Marxism. ...Lenin was a Jewish racist who deliberately gave Jews especially, the most 'intellectually demanding tasks.' He admitted that 50% of the communist terrorist vanguard in the south and west of Russia was comprised of Jews."

Lenin declared, "We are exterminating the bourgeoisie as a class." His partner in crime, Apfelbaum (Zinoviev) stated: "The interests of the revolution require the physical annihilation of the bourgeoisie class." Who were these bourgeoisie? Certainly not Jews. Trotsky gave a clue to their identity in a 1937 interview in the New York Jewish newspaper, Daily Forward: "The longer the rotten bourgeoisie society lives, the more and more barbaric will anti-Semitism become everywhere."

Bourgeoisie was a Bolshevik code-word for Gentile. The first law passed after the Communists seized power in Russia made anti-semitism a crime punishable by death. (Izvestia, July 27, 1918).

The top Communist Judaic official Zinoviev stated: "Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies in scores of hundreds. Let them be thousands; let them drown themselves in their own blood. For the blood of Lenin and Uritzky, Zinoviev and Vólodarsky, let there be floods of the blood of the bourgeoisie--more blood! As much as possible!" (Krasnaya Gazeta, Sept. 1, 1918).

The Judaic Bolsheviks regarded politics as a branch of Gentile pest control. Hatred of Christians, especially the peasant "bourgeoisie" was their prime motivation. The systematic destruction of the Christian peasantry of Russia as so many vermin, beginning with Lenin's attack on them in the summer of 1918 and his forced starvation in 1921, has been almost completely ignored in Western history.

According to the London, England "Jewish Chronicle" (Literary Supplement, Sept. 3, 1999, pp. iv and v) Jewish Communist writer Isaac Babel was present at a Soviet Communist gathering, "A meeting being addressed by Commissar Vinogradov who is enthusiastically telling the...Jews: 'You are in power. Everything is yours." Babel also wrote of the "unbounded" Jewish "contempt for the Polish gentry."

According to the "Jewish Chronicle," Babel wrote for the Communist publication "Red Trooper" and a Soviet commissar related to him how they intended to deal with Cossacks: "The revolutionary curve has thrown into the first rank the free Cossacks soaked in many prejudices, but the Central Committee's maneuvering will rub them down with a brush of iron.' Babel expresses no opinion on the chances of successfully rubbing out the Cossacks' 'soaked-in prejudices,' a euphemistic term for vicious anti-Semitism..." ("Jewish Chronicle," Ibid.)

"In the last years of the '20s and the early '30s, Babel was regarded as one of the most notable talents in Soviet literature. Speaking at the first writers' congress in 1934...he made the expected avowals of loyalty and devotion to the revolution, the government and the state. He even praised Stalin's literary style." ("Jewish Chronicle," Ibid.)

In his story, "The Rabbi's Son," Babel places the portraits of Lenin and Rabbi Moses Maimonides side by side. He notes that the margins of Communist leaflets are crowded with "Hebrew verse."

The Siberian novelist Valentin Rasputin wrote in 1990: "I think today the Jews here in Russia should feel responsible for the sin of having carried out the revolution and for the shape it took. They should feel responsible for the terror--for the terror that existed during the revolution and especially after the revolution...their guilt is great. They perpetrated the relentless campaign against the peasant class whose land was brutally expropriated by the state and who themselves were ruthlessly murdered."

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's biographer recounts what it was like to grow up as a Russian Christian child among the children of the Jewish communist elite: "By the age of ten he had the cross ripped from his neck by jeering Pioneers and for over a year was held up to ridicule... Solzhenitsyn was, as a boy, exposed to students whose parents had an officially superior status. Most of the members of the Young Pioneers and Komsomol movements, at least in Rostov, were Jewish children..." (Michael Scammell, Solzhenitsyn: A Biography, p. 64).

According to the internationally-syndicated RNS wire service (reprinted in "The Christian News," Jan. 8, 1996, p. 2), "Some 200,000 (Christian) clergy, many crucified, scalped and otherwise tortured, were killed during the approximately 60 years of communist rule in the former Soviet Union, a Russian commission reported Monday (Nov. 27, 1995)...40,000 churches (were) destroyed in the period from 1922 to 1980..."

[Read more at the above link...]

Real Zionist News

Who said: 'The Jews are our Misfortune?'
By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2012

“Die Juden sind unser Ungluck!” was a slogan, (a quote actually), printed on the bottom of the popular Third Reich newspaper, Der Sturmer.

Translated, the slogan states, “The Jews are our Misfortune!”
Der Sturmer was published by Julius Streicher from 1923 to 1945. The paper was endorsed by Hitler as a useful tool for influencing the man on the street. Yet still, neither Hitler nor Der Sturmer were the authors of the slogan.

After the war, Streicher was tried and hung at the Nuremberg trials for “crimes against humanity”—translate—”criticizing the Jews.” And the Jews got him “hung from the gallows” simply for publishing the paper.
In 1935, Der Sturmer published the article, “How the Jew Hates the Sturmer.” Excerpts from its opening lines describe why Jewry feared the paper:

“The Sturmer is a guide to the solution of the Jewish Question. A fearsome accuser of Pan-Jewry.

Over the last decades our thinking fell victim to the poisoning of the Jewish world press. The Jew even silenced the voice of German blood. Our people stood before the abyss of a complete lack of judgment.

This is why the Sturmer keeps saying: ‘The Jews Are Our Misfortune!’ This is why it is so hated by the Jews. Everyone knows that the Jew only fights that which he fears. And he fears the Sturmer in the depths of his soul!”
View Entire Story Here.

The article points to the dominance of Jewry over the media both in Germany and beyond its borders.

And in stating that the masses had fallen “victim” to the poisoning of the Jewish world press and “stood” before the abyss of complete lack of judgment, the paper was unknowingly auguring a warning for future generations.


“The Jews are our Misfortune!” was originally put forth by Heinrich von Treitschke (1834-1896), a Professor of History at the University of Berlin and admired for his penetrating analysis of German political life.

His greatest achievement was his multi-volume, “History of Germany in the 19th Century.”

In his University lectures, political essays, and even in his History of Germany, Treitschke expressed disdain for the Jews.

In 1880, he published a pamphlet entitled, “A Word About Our Jews,” which enjoyed much popularity. In this pamphlet the assertion, “The Jews are our misfortune,” first appeared.

Although to this day Jewry labels Treitschke as an “anti-Semite”… yet with astonishing prescience in sketching the Jewish problem of his day Treitschke shadowed forth the Western world’s current plight:

“The influence of Jewry on our national life nowadays shows itself in many ways harmful.

Just read the History of the Jews by Graetz. What rage against the ‘arch-enemy,’ the Christian Church!

Most dangerous is the preponderance of Jewry in the daily press. Their anti-Christian defamations and blasphemies are shocking.

Scarcely was emancipation achieved before Jewry demanded parity in everything. They refuse to see that we are a Christian people and that they are only a minority among us. We have experienced their demands that Christian images be set aside and that their sabbath be celebrated in mixed schools.

An evil that everyone felt but no one wanted to touch upon is now openly discussed. Among educated men who reject any idea of church intolerance there rings with one voice: ‘The Jews are our misfortune!’”
View Entire Story Here, Here & Here.

A SPIRITUAL DEVASTATION is now wreaking havoc in what formerly was known and experienced as “Christendom.”

In a newly published book, “Coming Apart: The State of White America,” the white working class is shown as no longer clinging to religion but letting go of everything that once distinguished it.

This is surely due to Jewry’s control of the media where defamation of the Church is rampant. The Jewish-produced sitcom, “Good Christian Bitches,” is just one example of Jewry’s ridicule of Christianity.

Could it be true then—that even today—the Jews are our misfortune?

Roy Tov
Israel Military Censor hits the USA
a multi-headed hydra reaches America’s East coast
Psychology Of Fraud: Why Good People Do Bad Things
Perennial Teachings
A collection of essays and articles written by Arseniy A. Kozlov
Inception: A Labyrinth of Inner Voyage
Wake Up and Smell the Innovation
Part 1 of:
"Life, Liberty, and The Pursuit of Happiness, How the Natural Law Concept of G. W. Leibniz Inspired America's Founding Fathers"
Excerpts from Emmerich de Vattel's Law of Nations
Part 2 of:
"Life, Liberty, and The Pursuit of Happiness, How the Natural Law Concept of G. W. Leibniz Inspired America's Founding Fathers"
Locke vs. Leibniz
Two Conflicting Conceptions of Human Nature
Part 3 of:
"Life, Liberty, and The Pursuit of Happiness, How the Natural Law Concept of G. W. Leibniz Inspired America's Founding Fathers"
Vattel's Conception of Natural Law
Part 4 of:
"Life, Liberty, and The Pursuit of Happiness, How the Natural Law Concept of G. W. Leibniz Inspired America's Founding Fathers"
Law for Man, Whose Nature Is Creative Reason
A Summary of Vattel's Law of Nations
LaRouche Pub
Great Project To Restore
The American System
In a recent discussion, Lyndon LaRouche identified NAWAPA (the North American Water and Power Alliance) as "the greatest project ever attempted by mankind." Not only will it bring a "full revival of the industrial and related potential of the U.S. economy," LaRouche said,
    "It would also be a major focus of cooperation with other nations.... With the combination of a space program, that is, the restoration of NASA, for example, and the development of NAWAPA, these two factors as the key factors in the U.S. economy, will ensure a general, early recovery of the United States economy, and will provide a system for the future of mankind, going into some centuries to come."
Sombart - Why America is "Steeped in Jewishness"

In his book "The Jews & Modern Capitalism," (1911) German sociologist Werner Sombart credits Jews for the rise of capitalism as the most dynamic force in the modern world.
In the excerpt below, he says Jews built the USA to become the epitome of capitalism: "Americanism is the Jewish spirit distilled."
What do you think he means, and do you agree? (
"Nineteen [families] were equipped with plough and scythe, ready to clear the forests and till the soil in order to earn their livelihood as husbandmen...The twentieth family opened a store."

By Werner Sombart
(From The Jews & Modern Capitalism, 1911, pp.35-39)

For what we call Americanism is nothing else, if we may say so, than the Jewish spirit distilled. But how comes it that American culture is so steeped in Jewishness?
The answer is simple -- through the early and universal admixture of Jewish elements among the first settlers.

We may picture the process of colonizing somewhat after this fashion. A band of determined men and women -- let us say twenty families -- went forth into the wilds to begin their life anew. Nineteen were equipped with plough and scythe, ready to clear the forests and till the soil in order to earn their livelihood as husbandmen.
The twentieth family opened a store to provide their companions with such necessaries of life as could not be obtained from the soil, often no doubt hawking them at the very doors.
Soon this twentieth family made it its business to arrange for the distribution of the products which the other nineteen won from the soil. It was they, too, who were most likely in possession of ready cash, and in case of need could therefore be useful to the others by lending them money.
Very often the store had a kind of agricultural loan-bank as its adjunct, perhaps also an office for the buying and selling of land. So through the activity of the twentieth family, the farmer in North America was from the first kept in touch with the money and credit system of the Old World.
Hence the whole process of production and exchange was from its inception along modern lines. Town methods made their way at once into even the most distant villages.
Accordingly, it may be said that American economic life was from its very start impregnated with capitalism. And who was responsible for this? The twentieth family in each village. Need we add that this twentieth family was always a Jewish one, which joined a party of settlers or soon sought them out in their homesteads?
Such in outline is the mental picture I have conceived of the economic development of the United States. Subsequent writers dealing with this subject will be able to fill in more ample details; I myself have only come across a few. But these are so similar in character that they can hardly be taken as isolated instances. The conclusion is forced upon us that they are typical.
Nor do I alone hold this view. Governor Pardel of California, for example, remarked in 1905: "He (the Jew) has been the leading financier of thousands of prosperous communities. He has been enterprising and aggressive."
Let me quote some of the illustrations I have met with. In 1785 Abraham Mordecai settled in Alabama. "He established a trading-post two miles west of Line Creek, carrying on an extensive trade with the Indians, and exchanging his goods for pink-root, hickory, nut oil and peltries of all kinds."
Similarly in Albany: "As early as 1661, when Albany was but a small trading post, a Jewish trader named Asser Levi (or Leevi) became the owner of real estate there."
Chicago has the same story. The first brick house was built by a Jew, Benedict Schubert, who became the first merchant tailor in Chicago, while another Jew, Philip Newburg, was the first to introduce the tobacco business.
In Kentucky, we hear of a Jewish settler as early as 1816. When in that year the Bank of the United States opened a branch in Lexington, a Mr. Solomon, who had arrived in 1808, was made cashier. In Maryland, Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania it is on record that Jewish traders were among the earliest settlers, though nothing is known of their activity.
On the other hand, a great deal is known of Jews in Texas, where they were among the pioneers of capitalism. Thus, for example, Jacob de Cordova "was by far the most extensive land locator in the State until 1856."
The Cordova's Land Agency soon became famous not only in Texas but in New York, Philadelphia and Baltimore, where the owners of large tracts of Texas land resided. Again, Morris Koppore in 1863 became President of the National Bank of Texas.
Henry Castro was an immigration agent; "between the years 1843-6 Castro introduced into Texas over 5000 immigrants . . . transporting them in 27 ships, chiefly from the Rhenish provinces. . . . He fed his colonists for a year, furnished them with cows, farming implements, seeds, medicine, and in short with everything they needed."
Sometimes branches of one and the same family distributed themselves in different States, and were thereby enabled to carry on business most successfully. Perhaps the best instance is the history of the Seligman family. There were eight brothers (the sons of David Seligman, of Bayersdorf, in Bavaria) who started a concern which now has branches in all the most important centers in the States.
Their story began with the arrival in America in the year 1837 of Joseph Seligman. Two other brothers followed in 1839; a third came two years later. The four began business as clothiers in Lancaster, moving shortly after to Selma, Ala.
From here they opened three branches in three other towns. By 1848 two more brothers had arrived from Germany and the six moved North.
In 1850, Jesse Seligman opened a shop in San Francisco -- in the first brick house in that city.
Seven years later a banking business was added to the clothing shop, and in 1862 the house of Seligman Brothers was established in New York, San Francisco, London, Paris and Frankfort.
In the Southern States likewise the Jew played the part of the trader in the midst of agricultural settlers.
Here also (as in Southern and Central America) we find him quite early as the owner of vast plantations. In South Carolina indeed, "Jew's Land" is synonymous with "Large Plantations."
It was in the South that Moses Lindo became famous as one of the first undertakers in the production of indigo.
These examples must suffice. We believe they tend to illustrate our general statement, which is supported also by the fact that there was a constant stream of Jewish emigration to the United States from their earliest foundation. It is true that there are no actual figures to show the proportion of the Jewish population to the total body of settlers. But the numerous indications of a general nature that we do find make it pretty certain that there must always have been a large number of Jews in America.
It must not be forgotten that in the earliest years the population was thinly scattered and very sparse. New Amsterdam had less than 1000 inhabitants.
That being so, a ship full of Jews who came from Brazil to settle there made a great difference, and in assessing Jewish influence on the whole district we shall have to rate it highly.
Or take another instance. When the first settlement in Georgia was established, forty Jews were among the settlers. The number may seem insignificant, but when we consider the meagre population of the colony, Jewish influence must be accounted strong. So, too, in Savannah, where in 1733 there were already twelve Jewish families in what was then a tiny commercial centre.
That America early became the goal of German and Polish Jewish emigrants is well known. Thus we are told: "Among the poorer Jewish families of Posen there was seldom one which in the second quarter of the 19th century did not have at least one son (and in most cases the ablest and not least enterprising) who sailed away across the ocean to flee from the narrowness and the oppression of his native land."
We are not surprised, therefore, at the comparatively large number of Jewish soldiers (7243) who took part in the Civil War, and we should be inclined to say that the estimate which puts the Jewish population of the United States about the middle of the 19th century at 300,000 (of whom 30,000 lived in New York) was if anything too moderate.

Related - Early American Jews (Includes Solomon Bush)
Comment from Milton:
I have been reading Madison Grants 'Conquest of a Continent' on an on/off basis as i am reading two other books as well. He does not seem to figure in the Jews much - incidentally the ADL had his book banned because they didn't want him talking about the Nordic race and the decline of numbers of people with blue eyes. He was working in an old people’s home and noticed that the older people had a higher incidence of blue eyes.
      I have often thought that Adam Smith was Jewish as he appears with a Jewish physiognomy on our twenty pound note. This would seem to fit with your article.

Real Currencies
The Conspiracy is Spiritual in Essence
While hiding behind Jewry, the ‘Illuminati’ are in reality Satanists. They are rebelling against God, like most of us are. The New World Order exists to show us where this rebellion must in extremis lead to.
The truth is that the Zionist-Pharisaic-Talmudist-Kabbalist-Sabbatean-Satanist conspiracy (acronym ZPTKSS) is spiritual in its essence. The end goal of these evil forces is to corrupt humanity.  Of course, humans always had the potential to be corrupted, but these ideologies are justifying and glorifying this corruption by emphasizing the love of money and material possessions, by focusing on terrestrial glory instead of spiritual development, on mechanical sexuality instead of love, and, most importantly, on the desires of the ego instead of those of the Creator.
"In nations which have made a false commencement, it would be found that the citizen, or rather the subject, has extorted immunity after immunity, as his growing intelligence and importance have both instructed and required him to defend those particular rights which were necessary to his well-being. A certain accumulation of these immunities constitutes... the essence of European Liberty, even at this hour. It is scarcely necessary to tell the reader that this freedom, be it more or less, depends on a principle entirely different from our own. Here the immunities do not proceed from, but they are granted to the government, being, in other words, concessions of natural rights made by the people to the state, for the benefit of social protection. So long as this vital difference exists between ourselves and other nations, it will be vain to think of finding analogies in their institutions. The mildest and justest governments in Europe are, at this moment, theoretically despotisms."
James Fenimore Cooper
Introduction to The Bravo

Eight reports on the origins of today's modern Anglo-Dutch oligarchical system.

A few caveats:
1) These reports do not offer a complete picture of either the political or the epistemological battles
that occurred during the historical period in question. Each report deals solely with the specific topic of
that report.
2) No attempt is made to present the "other side," i.e., the humanist pro-republican network.
3) It is assumed that the reader of these reports is already familiar with three things: Graham Lowry's
book1, particularly his insights into the political battle in England during the reign of Queen Anne;
LaRouche's writings on Palo Sarpi, empiricism, and the enlightenment; at least some of our previously
published writings on Venice. Most of what has already been covered in these published materials will
not be repeated here.
4) These reports are intended for reference and discussion purposes. They are not presented in a
finished or edited form for publication.
1) The oligarchy's spoor: Roman Law and Aristotelianism
2) The Spanish roots of free trade
3) Paolo Sarpi's web
4) From the "Right of Resistance" to John Locke
5) The Dutch tragedy
6) England: Venice triumphant
7) Slavery
8) Central banking
EU Observer
Question of nationality still the 'gravest problem' in Belgium
For Van Goethem, the reign of King Leopold II (1865-1909) is important for the constitutional amendment of 1893, which brought about universal manhood suffrage with plural votes, and the Equality Law of 1898, which required that "all legislation would be discussed, voted and enacted in both Dutch and French." The author sees the electoral reform of 1893 as the pivotal event in the history of the communitarian question in Belgium.
By the time King Albert I (1909-34) succeeded to the throne of his unpopular uncle, a fully-fledged Walloon Movement had emerged, largely in reaction to the fact that the Catholic Party, which had its power-base in Flanders, controlled the central government since 1884. Following the elections of July 1912 that saw the Catholics increase their majority, Jules Destrée, a Socialist representative from Charleroi, penned his open ‘Letter to the King,’ in which he declared, "Sire. . . there are no such things as Belgians’ and went on to make an appeal for ‘administrative separation’ and hence, in our author’s words, he ‘let the genie out of the bottle."
PPJ Gazette
Carbon Sense Coalition – on the “climate change” fight from Down Under

video shorts / documentary films
The Real Food Channel
How safe is your food?
GMO foods may alter organ function
A new study reveals alarming data
Controversy rages about the safety of genetically modified foods. Monsanto says there is no need to test these engineered foods. What is the other side of the story?
Can genetic modifications to foods affect human cells? Here are compelling research results from the journal Cell Research.
Next World TV
The Woman Who Started The Local Food Movement
Next World TV
The Many Uses Of Hemp
Next World TV
Transition Town: Visions of Transition
Ron Paul 2012 -Banned Commercial
KGB Agent Tells You What The Illusion Is!
Think mind control and social conditioning is just some grand conspiracy theory?
Defining How The UNITED STATES Is A Corporation And Not A Legit Government
Fight The New World Order with Global Non Compliance
David Icke and John D Rockefeller Are They Related?
David Icke and John D Rockefeller look incredibly alike. Is this a coincidence or is it evidence that Mr. David Icke may be keeping his family tree out of the limelight?
FreeTruthShow & ROTHSCHILD
patrick lynch: As i was halfway through the gardens i noticed a man in the shrubbery with two dogs like the ornaments outside their house. Once i confirmed his identity the questions began.
Gilad Atzmon
Israel's Secret Weapon - 2003
The program was broadcast for the first time in March 2003 just a few hours before Britain launched a criminal war against Iraq. Seemingly, the BBC knew who was possessing WMD in the region.
US Marine (Ret) Major Christopher Miller's Speech at Missouri RNC D3 Convention
Breaking AMAZING Newscaster tells people, government Satanists exposed - Wake Up
FBI scripts a fake terror plot,
group of idiots volunteer to play roles
C-Span Video
9/11, False Flags, and Black Ops: An Evening of Debate
A debate was held on conspiracy theories, specifically the truth behind the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The participants were Jonathan Kay, author of Among the Truthers: A Journey Through America's Growing Conspiracist Underground, and Webster Tarpley, self-described 9/11 Truth Scholar and one of the people featured in Mr. Kay's book. Mr. Tarpley's view of the September 2001 attacks appears in his book 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA. The debate was moderated David Frum, who was a special assistant to President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2002. Each author made a presentation, during which Mr. Tarpley included video, and then they responded to questions from members of the audience.
This International Spy Museum program was titled "9/11, False Flags, and Black Ops: An Evening of Debate with David Frum, Jonathan Kay, and Webster Tarpley."
“Quite revealing…” --Lark
Real Jew News
CISPA…Internet Spy Bill Exposed
The Ugly Truth
Challenging Notions of a Jewish People / Chuck Carlson
The Roots of Christian Zionism
How Scofield Sowed Seeds of Apostasy
Ever wonder why so many Christians support America's many wars, especially in the Middle East? A new Christianity has emerged from the Twentieth Century called Christian Zionism or what could be called, "Angry Evangelicalism," or "Dispensationalism on Steroids." What motivates a nationally known, evangelical preacher like John Hagee to call for a preemptive strike against Iran when it is contrary to what Jesus taught and commanded his followers to do? This "Roots of Zionism" presentation may be the first of its kind with a factual explanation of how Christianity's latest apostate epidemic was launched with the publishing of C. I. Scofield's reference Bible in 1909, and the influence of the notes in it. While purposefully reaching and helping many under Christian Zionist influence by featuring its identification and cure, this 2nd edition offers hope to all people, regardless of faith, who may also wish to leave its grasp. Film clips include action inside Gaza Strip and a moving interview with Shareen, a young Palestinian woman living in Gaza. Check out our website: for the latest news on Christian Zionism and the "Angry" evangelicals. Or listen to our free podcasts at
The Debt Generation
In 2008, the youth vote was overwhelmingly for Obama and helped elect him to the White House. Now, three years into his presidency and one year from the most important election of our lives, college students are thinking twice before voting for Obama again.
Water Frozen In Time
Cool Sound and Water Experiment!
Forbidden Knowledge TV / BBC
Ape Man: Adventures in Human Evolution
La Grotte du Pape
Dr. Etzel Cardenas is a clinical psychologist working for the US Department of Defense. His research is into altered states of consciousness. He is attempting to enter the primitive world of our most distant ancestors by interviewing Janet Crossley, an expert of self-hypnosis.
The program then takes us to the work of archeologists in southwest France, where a small figurine sculpted from the tusk of a mammoth was dated at 25,000 years old. It contains clear facial features of forehead, brows, eyes, nose but no mouth. The top and sides are incised with a representation of braided hair or an Egyptian-style headdress.
Were the beings who made this artifact human beings like us or from a different species?
OPEN the magazine
The Last of the Aryans

 Nobody knows of their real origin or if they are indeed Aryans. But, regarded as long-lost members of a purebred ‘Master Race’ settled in the Himalayas, Brokpas attract curious visitors, some of who try to satisfy their fantasy of having pure Aryan babies
In 2007, filmmaker Sanjeev Sivan released his documentary Achtung Baby: In Search of Purity on the phenomenon of German women travelling to Indian villages by the Line of Control (LoC) in Kashmir to get impregnated by men they believe to be racially pure Aryans. These villages are inhabited by a tribe called Brokpas, who are rumoured to be the ‘last pure specimens’ of the Aryan race. Across the world, several people still regard Aryans as the ‘Master Race’—tall, blue-eyed blondes endowed with superior intelligence and values.
While Brokpa folklore says that the community arrived here from Gilgit in Pakistan just across the LoC, there is a view that they are actually descendants of Alexander the Great’s army, whose Genghis Khan-like sexual profligacy is a matter of legend. Much Greek DNA is said to exist in north India even today. What marks Brokpas out, however, is that they have lived isolated lives for centuries in such an inaccessibly harsh terrain that they seem to have kept their DNA untainted by outsiders. Thus, the tantalising prospect of purity.
The Green Body Cleanse
How to Cleanse your Body and Home of Harmful Toxins Using Organic Methods
By Dr. Edward F. Group III
The Secret Memoirs of General James Wilkinson
Volume One
The True Spirit of ‘76
By Keith Thompson
Slavery in the Modern World
A History of Social, Political, and Economic Oppression
By Junius P. Rodriguez, Editor
The Road to Revolution
By Theodore J. Kaczynski
With afterwords by Dr. Patrick Barriot and Dr. David Skrbina
Convergent Evolution
Limited Forms Most Beautiful
By George McGhee
Case Against Democracy In Favour Of Fascism
By William Joyce
Life of an Anarchist
The Alexander Berkman Reader
Edited by Gene Fellner
(1992; 2005)
The “Palestine” Plot
By B. Jensen

By Helen Peters
(1970; 1985)
Conspiracy is invisible otherwise there would be no need for this book. In fact, if conspiracy WERE visible, there would BE no conspiracy.
The origin of the Union Jack conspiracy is its mockery of Christ in Rev. 1:8. It is made up of two outstanding crosses. X is Alpha. + is Omega. This is what Christ called Himself. The rulership of the world by the British Empire is a usurpation of the sovereignty of Jesus Christ.
The mongrel banner shown on the front cover originated in the mind of a demented tyrant who acquired his mammoth fortune in America - one Andrew Carnegie. This half Union Jack and half Stars and Stripes mean more than a freak flag waving in the breeze. It represents a Satanic conspiracy to control the world with a pseudo-Christianity that is opposite to the grace of Jesus Christ.
Spies, Wiretaps, and Secret Operations
An Encyclopedia of American Espionage
Glenn P. Hastedt, Editor
The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity
By Carlo M. Cipolla